Exact(4)
The data were categorized for proximal, middle and distal third tibial fractures for analysis.
Data were categorized for the material investigated.
Demographic and clinical data were categorized for survivors and nonsurvivors and the results were displayed as frequency, median values and interquartile range.
30 Data were entered into a spreadsheet by using Microsoft (Redmond, WA) Excel 2004 for Mac (version 11.5.6) and were analyzed by using Stata version 11.0 (StatCorp, College Station, TX) and R version 2.8.1 (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/). Age data were categorized for children (< 2, 2 4, > 4 years of age) and mothers (< 25, 25 35, and > 35 years of age).
Similar(56)
This figure presents how the data is categorized for WFD when a fixed number of task sets is used as input.
Data was categorized for each genotype across the three main GO categories of biological process, cellular component and molecular function.
Continuous data were categorized into categorical variables using SPSS for Windows release 19.0.
When different assays were run on the same resin or class of closely related resins (e.g., three Tritan resins), the data were categorized as "yes" versus "no" for EA if the %RME2 for each individual assay was equal to, or greater than, 15%RME2 versus less than 15%respectivelytively.
The NEISS data was also categorized by disposition: Released, Hospitalized, Fatality, and Other (including transferred, left without being seen, not recorded, etc).. Age groups (in years) for NEISS data were categorized as: 2 4, 5 10, 11 13, 14 17, 18 22, 23 29, 30 39, 40 49, and 50 + .
Data were categorized and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
These data were categorized by ward and using population figures for LSMC wards as a denominator, the average annual incidence of S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A and total enteric fever in each of the 22 wards and overall in LSMC was calculated over this four year period and is reported in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com