Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The reported data were appraised separately by two independent assessors (V.R.M. and C.G.M).
Similar(58)
The studies' design, setting, demographic data and microbiological methods were appraised.
In addition, the studies were appraised by the publication influence factor, restriction of control, data completion and so on.
Qualitative papers were appraised according to whether they reported achieving thematic saturation during data collection [ 50].
A structured data extraction form was developed to ensure that the articles accepted for review were appraised in a consistent way by both investigators (see additional file 1 ).
Of the 84 articles selected for full review, 50 were appraised as low or moderate quality, and the remaining 39 studies were selected for data abstraction.
Twelve publications were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.
Studies were appraised for quality.
Eligible studies were appraised using defined criteria.
The validity of the quantitative data findings has been appraised using qualitative data collected in ten exploratory interviews.
MIC data have also been appraised (Dumazet et al. 1997; Mistry and Desai 2014).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com