Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
All data was reviewed by a second investigator.
Data was reviewed by the authors to determine if the alarms and response were appropriate.
The qualitative data was reviewed by two persons.
Further, all pathology data was reviewed by the same expert breast pathologist.
For consistency, all questionnaire data was reviewed by a single researcher (JP) as it was received, to identify inconsistencies and likely reporting errors in the data requiring follow-up.
This research involving human subjects, human material or human data was reviewed by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command's Office of Research Protections, Institutional Review Board Office, and was granted an exemption from requiring ethics approval.
Similar(53)
Data were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers and verified by a PhD laboratory director prior to reporting.
All data were reviewed by AMS and any discrepancies were resolved among reviewers.
Data were reviewed by nuclear medicine and radiology physicians.
Radiological data were reviewed by three radiologists with expertise in paediatric neurological (K.K.v.U ., cardiothoracic (D.G.H.B).
All X-rays and CT scans of the patients with follow-up data were reviewed by a single investigator to avoid inter-observer errors.
More suggestions(14)
data collection was reviewed by
data was examined by
documentation was reviewed by
database was reviewed by
evidence was reviewed by
reported was reviewed by
dataset was reviewed by
data well reviewed by
reporting was reviewed by
data was ensured by
data was provided by
data was supplemented by
data was obtained by
data was published by
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com