Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Our data was rated by two psychiatrists trained in the use of OPCRIT, and a test-retest on a random sample of ten note sets showed good inter-rater reliability [ 20].
Therefore, for the studies included on the basis of the second and third query, as well as on the basis of the list of publications cited in previous reviews, the effect data was extracted by GJP (the manipulation quality data was rated independently by RR and GK, see below).
Similar(58)
To make sure the scoring of the written data was conducted reliably, two-thirds of the data were rated by a professional expert colleague.
The Writing Section and Speaking Section data were rated on a 4-point scale, with 0 assigned to the lowest performance and 3 to the highest performance.
Normative data are rated according to the age (5 18 years) and gender of the subject.
These extracted data are rated and categorized by two medical doctors.
Given that all of the data were rated on nominal or ordinal scales, results are presented as frequencies and percentages.
Whilst public surveys suggest that health provider data is rated as being important, it is not clear how useful this data is [ 11].
Salivary melatonin data were rated for reliability following guidelines similar to those used for urinary aMT6s, and poor quality data were eliminated from further analyses.
But requests to Ticketmaster's data are rate-limited.
Data are rates (95% confidence interval) per 100 000 people per year unless stated otherwise.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com