Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
At baseline patient data was evaluated by questionnaires.
The data was evaluated by mono-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Adsorption data was evaluated by applying adsorption isotherm models, thermodynamic and kinetic studies.
Adsorption data was evaluated by applying pseudo first and pseudo second order kinetic models.
Data was evaluated by analysis of variance considering the repeated measurement structure of the data.
The tree topology of the neighbor-joining data was evaluated by Bootstrap analysis with 100 re-samplings.
Quality of social media data was evaluated by utilizing either simple (timeliness, popularity) or trained models (relevancy).
The accuracy of experimental data was evaluated by modeling of samples in ABAQUS software at the end of this study.
The usefulness of this data was evaluated by staff members in relation to its impact on their module planning.
Equality of variances was verified with the Levene's test and normal distribution of data was evaluated by a Kolmogorov Smirnov test.
The usefulness of the corrected OBTM data was evaluated by comparison to the Paros OBP data which have relatively low instrumental noises.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com