Transcripts were coded and analysed using a thematic approach whereby data were categorised and summarised according to themes identified through the coding and analysis process [35].
Given the differences between studies and the limitations of the literature, it is difficult to be sure that a pivotal episode number exists between this range after which effectiveness changes or whether this is simply a function of how data were categorised and analysed.
Continuous data were categorised and the independent variables are presented as frequencies.
The interview data were categorised and analysed thematically by three researchers independently using triangulation method.
To obtain the directly standardised prevalence rate, BETS data were categorised and applied to the National population [ 19].
The data were categorised and scored for analysis using the following summary measures: Treatment plan (the unit of analysis) Treatment plan (the unit of analysis) We analysed each patient's first presentation at an MDT meeting within the observation period.
The data was categorised based on personal and professional qualities.
The data was categorised into adolescent (aged 10-19) adultdult (20+) categories.
Clinical toxicity data was categorised by using Standard NCI CTC ver2.0 criteria and included four gradings for each of thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, mucositis and diarrhoea.
