Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
Such thresholds are suitable when the data recipient is trusted.
The extent to which the data recipient is motivated and capable of re-identifying the data.
The devil is in the detail, and the detail is highly specific to each study, and each potential data recipient.
First, mitigating controls: this is the set of security and privacy practices that the data recipient has in place.
Mitigating controls evaluate the extent to which the data recipient has good security and privacy practices in place.
It is also used when the data recipient will sign a data use/sharing agreement with the custodian.
Similar(41)
A substantial quantity of EMR data is in natural language form and there are concerns that automated tools for detecting identifiers are imperfect and leak information that can be exploited by ill-intentioned data recipients.
This is a subjective decision that requires consultation with the data recipients.
The de-identification methods that have the most acceptability among data recipients are masking, generalization, and suppression (see below).
There were no significant difference in donors' and graft data, recipients' data, intraoperative data, hemodynamic and kidney functioning data and outcomes in both groups.
This construct captures the fact that some data recipients can be trusted more than others (e.g., researchers vs. making data available to the general public).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com