Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The closeness of the hypothetical model of PQLI to the empirical data of interviewing rating scores is evaluated statistically through gamma test [ 20].
Similar(59)
We realised that with reading there were some really important factors; factors that could only come from soft data of interviews and opinions.
Figure 4 Basic demographics data of interview participants.
Table 5 Demographic data of interview respondents: gender Gender Frequency Percent Female 49 48 Male 45 44 Missing data 8 8 Total 102 102.
Table 10 Demographic data of interview respondents: special training in science Special training Frequency Percent No 66 65 Yes 35 34 Missing data 1 1 Total 102 102.
Table 12 Demographic data of interview respondents: grade just completed (students) Grade just completed Frequency Percent Third to sixth grade 14 74 Seventh to 11th grade 5 26 Total 19 190.
The paper uses insights from primary field data of interviews and observations, as well as reference to media and news reports.
Table 7 Demographic data of interview respondents: residence Place of residence Frequency Percent New Haven area 41 40 Other Connecticut 39 38 Other USA 18 18 International 3 3 Missing data 1 1 Total 102 102.
Table 6 Demographic data of interview respondents: age Age, years Frequency Percent 10 13 years 18 18 14 18 years 5 5 19–39 years 40 39 40 59 years 28 29 60 plus years 9 9 Missing data 1 1 Total 102 101aPercentsts add up to >100 due to rounding.
Table 9 Demographic data of interview respondents: how informed do visitors feel about scientific discoveries and technology How informed visitors feel Frequency Percent Very well informed 30 29 Moderately well informed 59 58 Poorly informed 10 10 Missing data 3 3 Total 102 102.
Table 8 Demographic data of interview respondents: visiting Visiting Frequency Percent Alone 10 10 With family 79 78 With friends 13 13 Total 102 101aPercentsts add up to >100 due to rounding.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com