Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Lung perfusion data (n = 3) showed good agreement with simulations.
a) fMRI during-scan behavioral data (n = 125 males, 180 trials for each participant); b) post-scan behavioral data (n = 125 males, 90 trials for each participant); c) independent online-replication data (n = 315 subjects, 82 trials for each participant); d) independent oxytocin behavioral replication data (n = 80 males, 82 trials for each participant).
Comparison of fracture magnitude with experimental data (n = 4 animals, 5 experiments).
Comparison of eccentricity of local correlation with experimental data (n = 4 animals, 5 experiments).
Comparison of dimensionality for model with experimental data (n = 4 animals, 5 experiments).
The two clusters were extracted by fitting a Gaussian mixture model to the data (n = 433 units from 13 mice).
Risk perception estimates are produced using a statistical model based on national survey data (n = 9,217).
Data (n = 787) were modelled against cull location, date, and F. hepatica diagnosis.
Bars indicate the standard errors of the mean data (n = 5), and different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments.
The permuted data (n = 1000) was generated by separately shuffling the spikes of each unit and each trial while preserving the ISI distribution.
Bars indicate the standard errors of the mean data (n = 5), and different letters indicate significant differences among the different treatments (p < 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com