Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Confidence intervals indicate two other differences when the data is corrected in which the humeral length of reptiles scales significantly higher than that of mammals when compared to body mass and the humeral circumference in ungulates scales higher than that of carnivorans when compared to body mass.
Similar(59)
The emission data was corrected in a standardised way (random, scatter and attenuation) and iteratively reconstructed (matrix size, 256 × 256, Fourier rebinning [VIP mode], VUE Point FX [3D] with 3 iterations, 18 subsets).
Some obviously incorrect data are corrected in connection with the quality controls.
Data were corrected for changes in excitation intensity by dividing the spectrally corrected emission data by the spectrally corrected excitation intensity (Sc/Rc).
However, when these 2DG import data were corrected for differences in cell size or protein content, no effects of either loss of TOR or Rheb were apparent.
Fluidigm data were corrected for differences in input RNA using the geometric mean of three reference genes ACTB, HPRT and RPL22.
Dynamic sinogram data were corrected for dead time in each frame in addition to detector normalization.
For comparison of cytokine concentrations, one-way ANOVA testing was applied and data were corrected for multiple testing in post-hoc analyses (Dunnett-T or Bonferroni, where appropriate).
Briefly, raw intensity data was corrected by background subtraction in the Genome Studio module and normalized using the Quantile normalization algorithm.
Our data show that many of the cell line data are correct: in most solid tumors, it appears that anthracycline and topotecan exposure do lead to decreased topoisomerase II and I expression respectively, while inducing the expression of drug efflux pump molecules.
Photobleaching and photoactivation data were corrected for cell translation and rotation in the stack_reg plug-in.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com