Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The good correlation obtained with our data, in this test case, indicates that this extremely fast method is adequate for this purpose.
Similar(57)
Model A has larger model-data differences in this test than in Test (1), which can be explained by the fact that Test (1) relied on secular variation values at epochs closer to 2010.0 (up to 2009.3 for Test (1), up to 2008.5 for Test (2)).
Even though differences of 1 CIELab unit are described as not perceptible by an average human observer [18] we have included this data in the test set to investigate if the proposed algorithm is better than the human visual system in recognising perceptually similar colours.
This paper reviews and critically discusses the methods available for data analysis in this test and proposes some new approaches.
Part I of this program described a mathematical model for predicting the dynamic response of PRV's, and the data described in this test program were used to evaluate the accuracy of the model, as described in Part III of this study to follow.
SAMtools demonstrates an apparent lack of data caching in this test, but was still fast and responsive.
The experimental approaches and data presentation in this test were selected to minimize any specialized background knowledge required to understand the questions.
We used individual level clinical data in this dataset to test the adapted Charlson index.
In collecting data for this test, each element or experimental unit in the sample must generate two paired or matched data values, one from population 1 and one from population 2. Differences between the paired or matched data values are used to test for a difference between the two populations.
However, there are no published data evaluating this test in patients with circulatory shock.
Consistent with these data, in this study, we tested the potential cytostatic effect of pertuzumab to that of trastuzumab in multiple USPC primary cell lines expressing different levels of HER2/neu expression.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com