Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
This article evaluates the usefulness of different sources in identifying data for the systematic review.
We chose to use population data for the systematic search because of the large sized populations and generalisability of findings.
The findings are strengthened by the rigorous methods used to prepare the data for the systematic review.
Describe sources of funding or other support (such as supply of data) for the systematic review, and the role of funders for the systematic review.
A search of all registered trials on ClinicalTrials.gov as well as two major nephrology journals (Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and Kidney International) and the conference proceedings and abstracts from annual American Society of Nephrology and World Congress of Nephrology meetings for inclusion of unpublished data for the systematic review was done.
Similar(55)
Reviewers may contact the original investigators to try to obtain missing information or confirm the data extracted for the systematic review.
AD, SP, JD, and EY were responsible for data collection for the systematic review and the interpretation of data.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, Web of Sciences and EBM reviews were the data sources for the systematic review.
The data retrieved for the systematic review were based on searches of all published papers, letters, abstracts, and review articles on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking and breast cancer using the MEDLINE database from January 1966 through February 2007.
In addition, four more studies were excluded due to not clearly displaying appropriate data or to providing lack of the required data for this systematic review [ 23, 34, 45, 46].
NIRS3 reflectance data were corrected for the systematic offsets of pixel signals (broken line) and further corrected using the fitting parameters calculated from the signal intensity of pixel 29 (Fig. 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com