The phrase "data for the material" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used when referring to information or facts that are specifically related to a particular material or substance. Example: The scientists collected extensive data for the material before conducting their experiments.
In general, these models are empirical or phenomenological and contain parameters that must be determined using constant, and in some cases variable, amplitude fatigue data for the material system in question.
In response to queries about the constitutive model used and sources of data for the material constants of the model, such statements as "… I don't know much about this area so I asked my buddy down the hall to give me some numbers" are music to the ears of litigators investigating disasters that involved computational efforts.
The test data for the material showing no fatigue limit on a log log (not a semi-log) paper results in a straight line plot, but for the materials showing fatigue limit the data plot is an asymptote to the fatigue limit for any of the probabilities of failure.
The type of information gained by each method could give valuable data for the material's quality.
At the same time, linear elastic finite element simulations are performed with input data for the materials different from the 4-PBB.
Crystal defects in a plastically deformed Mg Zn–Y alloy have been studied on the atomic scale using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy, providing important structural data for understanding the material's deformation behavior and strengthening mechanisms.
Limited experimental and clinical data exist for the material properties of the Refobacin® Bone Cement R. Kock et al. [ 6] compared the chemical composition, handling properties, and ISO standard mechanical testing of four different bone cements in vitro.
The squares in the same figure present the data for the bulk material [17] displaying a considerable drop of refractive index for the film in comparison with bulk material.
The evaluated data for these materials in the existing nuclear data libraries — ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF-3.1, JENDL-4.0, CENDL-3.1, ROSFOND, IRDFF 1.0 — are reviewed, discrepancies are identified, and some integral properties are given.
One problem is the consideration under which conditions the existing data for the respective material can be used, as such data can comprise the bulk, the molecular, or similar nanoforms of a particular material.
X-ray diffraction data for the explosive material which the simulants were based upon.
