Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
For data evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test, results that were statistically significant were indicated with a '**' symbol; results that were not statistically significant were indicated with a '#' symbol.
The imaging data evaluated with the InVivoScope and Vinci 2.3.1.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was performed on a BD FACS Canto (BD Bioscience, Allschwil, Switzerland) and data evaluated with FlowCytomix Pro 3.0 software (eBioscience).
Similar(57)
A series of isotherm studies were undertaken, and the data evaluated for compliance with the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.
The additional data evaluated here are consistent with previously reported data.
Pre-and post-assessment tools were used in the data gathering process, and the data were evaluated with descriptive statistics.
A second experienced researcher unfamiliar with the data evaluated the codebook; differences were solved by discussion.
Data were evaluated with ProteinLynx GlobalServer 2.4 software and Mascot 2.04 data browser.
Specifically, the photo-cross-linking data were evaluated with existing ligand binding models to provide information about spatial orientation in the binding site.
Optimization data was evaluated with single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether statistically significant differences exist between data sets.
Data were evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality; Student's t-test was used for normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U for non-parametric data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com