The phrase "data comparison to" is not a complete sentence and is not grammatically correct.
It may be part of a longer sentence, but it would need to be rephrased or expanded upon to be used effectively in written English. Possible rephrasing or expansion could include: - "In this study, the data comparison to previous research showed significant differences." - "Using the software, we were able to conduct a thorough data comparison to identify any discrepancies." - "The data comparison to our competitors' sales figures highlighted areas for improvement in our marketing strategy."
Here too, a threshold needs to be set for expression data comparison to be done.
Although some measures were problematic, Census data comparison to assess reasonable representativeness of the study sample was generally reassuring.
Strengths of this study include the large population; high quality comprehensive data; comparison to individuals without diabetes, and to those with diabetes but not treated with glucose-lowering medications; and the extensive range of variables available for analysis.
The first was a 35-item checklist for reporting quality, and the second was a set of four criteria for study quality (randomization, prospective collection of economic data, comparison to usual care, and no blinding).
Further investigation of the Brazilian Portuguese language instrument should focus on testing sensitivity and responsiveness in longitudinal studies and providing a data comparison to healthy Brazilian children and adolescents.
More opportunities for students to make data comparisons, to create and interpret data representations and recognise their core distributional features and to read critically 'beyond the data' (cf. Curcio, 2010) are also in need of research and curriculum development.
PA contributed to the revision and interpretation of microarray data, comparisons to the published transcriptional and post-transcriptional ESR datasets, and revision of the manuscript.
Data from these stations are used for model-data comparison to evaluate the model performance.
The plausibility of the imputed data and the assumed missing data mechanism were checked by exploring the distributions of the imputed data in comparison to the original data.
Further analysis including the phonologic data with comparison to local data will be needed to confirm these sorts of hypotheses.
For prospective disease surveillance it could be useful to interpret current data in comparison to reference data from previous years.
