Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The spectra acquired by the three modes of data collection were compared and analyzed for a better understanding of instrumental configuration.
Similar(59)
Demographic and clinical characteristics of registry participants using CGM and participants not using CGM at the 1-year data collection were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and χ tests for categorical variables (Mantel-Haenszel statistics were used for ordered categories).
Frames at the beginning and the end of each data collection were compared to exclude the possibility of protein aggregation and/or radiation damage.
The correlation between the two measures was in the low moderate range, but expected given that two very different methods of data collection were compared.
Different strategies for incomplete data collection were compared with complete data collection.
The data collection is compared annually to the birth registry of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office to ensure record completeness.
The final model for the PHQ-9 was the same for face-to-face and telephone data, with error covariances between items 3 and 4, and 7 and 8. Therefore, it served as the baseline model to which the constrained model (with constraints on all parameters across modes of data collection) was compared.
Subsequent to the data collection, scores were compared and discussed until consensus was reached.
Team analysis meetings, attended by the researchers from each of the sites and investigators, were held monthly during and after the data collection period, and findings were compared and discussed within the group.
The individual fermentation performance of each of the ~5100 yeast clones of the homozygous diploid deletion collection was compared with BY4743 (data not shown; Figure 1).
Original daily SOFA score flow charts and adapted (simplified) SOFA score flow charts (SOFA on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, 24, 28 etc.; i.e. values of unlisted days expressed as trends between data collection days) were compared for individuals and the whole group of patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com