Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
MCM and DSS conceived the idea for the study, contributed to the design of the research, were involved in the data collection, and discussed the data.
RH, TT, TS, TH and DU participated in data collection and discussed and reviewed the manuscript.
Findings were verified with participants during subsequent data collection and discussed with nurse participants via presentations.
Similar(57)
Therefore, ensuring the relevance of lines of inquiry prior to data collection and discussing findings with the different actors were key components of our research.
In this cohort profile, we aim to describe our study protocol, present its first results and ongoing data collection, and discuss the methodological issue of potential participation bias at study entry, which is one of the concerns for the external validity of cohort studies, for example, it is often assumed that the more healthy group is over-represented.
EB conceived and designed the study, participated in the data collection and analyses, discussed the results and drafted the original manuscript.
The participant selection criteria and rationale, methods of data collection and topics discussed are summarised in table 1. *Interviewing mothers during the postpartum period was felt to be intrusive.
HBQ and GC co-worked on associated data collection, interpretation and discussed analyses and wrote the paper, RPK revised the manuscript, HYL and MZQ analyzed the data and interpreted the results.
DZX, YQZ and WL co-worked on associated data collection, interpretation and discussed analyses.
Two research team members (RH and DG) collaboratively reflected on their data collection experiences and discussed prominent issues raised by participants.
The emerging analysis was thematic and iterative and to ensure reliability [ 20] was analysed independently by two colleagues that were not involved in the data collection process and discussed with the advisory group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com