Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
As shown in figure the dots generally formed a line consistent with regression line, therefore the residuals (the difference between observed data and expected data) are considered normally distributed.
Similar(59)
All data were considered normally distributed (all p values >0.337).
Data was considered normally distributed after examination of the Q-Q plots.
Data were considered normally distributed if the Z value did not exceed ± 2.0 [ 25].
A correlation was noted between the prescribed effluent flow rate and CLHDF for vancomycin but not for other antibiotics (online supplement Figure S2; see Additional file 1).> -wrap-foot> asignificancesignificance was determined by using the t test because the data were considered normally distributed; the Mann-Whitney test was used for the remaining analyses.
Data that could be considered normally distributed were compared using two-tailed paired t-tests, whereas data that did not conform to the normal distribution were compared using non-directional (two-tailed) Mann–Whitney U-tests.
As a result, the data obtained can be considered normally distributed and having similar variances (p = 0.05).
Normally the mean values of mechanical properties are sufficient to use theoretical models, whereas all tested specimen data are considered (including the mean values) in Weibull distribution.
If the Sig. the value of Shapiro-Wilk test is greater than 0.05 than data is considered as normally distributed and if it is lesser than 0.05, data is not considered as the normally distributed (Razali and Wah 2011).
The Shapiro-Wilk statistical test was employed with data being considered as normally distributed if p≥0.05.
The data were considered not normally distributed if the Shapiro-Wilk test had P ≤ 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com