Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa ascalement scale.
Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the studies.
Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the methods.
We briefly describe the test data and assess the matching performance of our approach using that data.
FA, IO, and SA conducted the literature searches, selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality.
Data abstraction: Using a standardised protocol, two reviewers independently abstracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of each paper.
FD, SBA, ZH, and LOB screened the abstracts, selected the studies meeting the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality.
The geological structural context of the crystalline bedrock at Forsmark implied a fracture network concept was the natural description for interpreting site data and assessing the groundwater pathway.
Two well-established simple diffusion models (Fickian, Langmuir) were used to interpret the mass uptake data and assess the suitability of such models for these tests.
The tasks were designed to provide information about students' current understandings of creating data, organizing data, and assessing the center and "spreadoutness" of data.
Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
