Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Briefly, for each DASH item, participants provided a Yes/No judgement of whether the item was a match to the theoretical definition of each ICF construct.
Similar(59)
The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged.
A recently published study used 4 judges to link the ICF to the DASH items [ 21].
In this study the ICF coding taxonomy was employed and individual DASH items were assigned one or more ICF code.
The first short-form included 11 randomly selected items from the full-length DASH (items 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 24, 27).
Similar to the DASH, each item has 5 response options and, from the item scores, scale scores are calculated, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
The DASH contains items able to measure each of the three ICF outcomes with discriminant validity.
Grip strength and DASH score (items 1 21, 22 30 and total) were assessed for correlation with DASH and subgroups.
In 3 groups (20 healthy volunteers, 17 patients after distal radius fractures, 12 patients with different hand/wrist conditions) grip strength and DASH scores (items 1 21, 22 30 and total) were assessed.
In this study we adapted the algorithm to obtain two sub-scores; DASH activity including 21 items (item 1 21), and DASH symptoms including 9 items (item 22 30) [ 23].
The QuickDASH consists of 11 items from the original 30-item DASH.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com