Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
danger was
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "danger was" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or state in the past where danger existed or was present. Example: "The danger was evident as the storm approached, with dark clouds gathering in the sky."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Danger was constant.
News & Media
The danger was extraordinary.
News & Media
Physical danger was inevitable.
News & Media
The danger was real".
News & Media
Now that danger was coming into view.
News & Media
And the danger was often very real.
News & Media
But much more danger was to come.
News & Media
I wondered what the danger was.
News & Media
The danger was part of the allure.
News & Media
The danger was East's having four trumps.
News & Media
Suddenly, it felt like danger was everywhere.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "danger was", follow it with an adjective or phrase that clarifies the specific type or intensity of the danger. For example: "The danger was imminent" or "The danger was underestimated".
Common error
Avoid using "danger was" without providing sufficient context. It's essential to specify what the danger was related to and why it was significant. Without this context, the statement can be vague and uninformative.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "danger was" functions as a statement indicating the presence of peril in a past context. It is typically followed by additional information specifying the nature or source of the danger. Ludwig AI supports the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
95%
Encyclopedias
2%
Science
1%
Less common in
Wiki
1%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "danger was" effectively communicates the existence of peril in a past context, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. Predominantly found in news and media sources, this phrase serves to inform readers about potential risks or threats. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to specify the nature and source of the danger. Related phrases like "peril existed" and "risk was present" offer alternative ways to express similar ideas. By providing sufficient context, writers can avoid ambiguity and ensure that the significance of the danger is well understood.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
peril existed
Replaces "danger" with "peril", a synonym, and uses "existed" instead of "was" to describe the state of being.
risk was present
Substitutes "danger" with "risk", conveying a similar meaning, and uses "present" to indicate the existence of the risk.
threat was looming
Replaces "danger" with "threat" and uses "looming" to suggest an impending sense of danger.
hazard was apparent
Substitutes "danger" with "hazard", indicating a potential source of harm, and uses "apparent" to highlight the obviousness of the danger.
a threat existed
Similar to "threat was looming" but more generally stating the existence of a threat in the past.
insecurity prevailed
Emphasizes a general lack of safety, replacing "danger" with the broader concept of "insecurity".
safety was compromised
Focuses on the absence of safety, indicating that the existing safety measures were insufficient.
security was at risk
Highlights the compromised state of security, emphasizing the potential for harm or loss.
vulnerability existed
Highlights the state of being susceptible to harm, focusing on the weakness or exposure to danger.
stability was undermined
Shifts the focus to the disruption caused by the danger, suggesting a destabilizing effect.
FAQs
How can I use "danger was" in a sentence?
Use "danger was" to describe a past situation where a risk or threat existed. For example, "The "danger was imminent" as the hurricane approached the coast".
What are some alternatives to using the phrase "danger was"?
You can use alternatives like "peril existed", "risk was present", or "threat was looming" depending on the specific context you want to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "danger was"?
Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "danger was" is a simple statement indicating that a state of danger existed in the past. Ludwig AI also confirms the grammatical correctness.
What is the difference between "danger was" and "there was danger"?
While both phrases convey a similar meaning, "danger was" often implies a specific, identifiable danger, whereas "there was danger" can be more general. For example, "The danger was the approaching storm" versus "There was danger in the abandoned building".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested