Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

danger was

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "danger was" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or state in the past where danger existed or was present. Example: "The danger was evident as the storm approached, with dark clouds gathering in the sky."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Danger was constant.

News & Media

The New York Times

The danger was extraordinary.

News & Media

The New York Times

Physical danger was inevitable.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The danger was real".

News & Media

The New York Times

Now that danger was coming into view.

News & Media

The New Yorker

And the danger was often very real.

But much more danger was to come.

News & Media

Independent

I wondered what the danger was.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The danger was part of the allure.

News & Media

The New York Times

The danger was East's having four trumps.

News & Media

The New York Times

Suddenly, it felt like danger was everywhere.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "danger was", follow it with an adjective or phrase that clarifies the specific type or intensity of the danger. For example: "The danger was imminent" or "The danger was underestimated".

Common error

Avoid using "danger was" without providing sufficient context. It's essential to specify what the danger was related to and why it was significant. Without this context, the statement can be vague and uninformative.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "danger was" functions as a statement indicating the presence of peril in a past context. It is typically followed by additional information specifying the nature or source of the danger. Ludwig AI supports the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

95%

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

1%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "danger was" effectively communicates the existence of peril in a past context, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. Predominantly found in news and media sources, this phrase serves to inform readers about potential risks or threats. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to specify the nature and source of the danger. Related phrases like "peril existed" and "risk was present" offer alternative ways to express similar ideas. By providing sufficient context, writers can avoid ambiguity and ensure that the significance of the danger is well understood.

FAQs

How can I use "danger was" in a sentence?

Use "danger was" to describe a past situation where a risk or threat existed. For example, "The "danger was imminent" as the hurricane approached the coast".

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "danger was"?

You can use alternatives like "peril existed", "risk was present", or "threat was looming" depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "danger was"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "danger was" is a simple statement indicating that a state of danger existed in the past. Ludwig AI also confirms the grammatical correctness.

What is the difference between "danger was" and "there was danger"?

While both phrases convey a similar meaning, "danger was" often implies a specific, identifiable danger, whereas "there was danger" can be more general. For example, "The danger was the approaching storm" versus "There was danger in the abandoned building".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: