Compared to the in-danger group (Group 3), the normal group (Group 2) was significantly influenced by the following factors: gender (wald = 8.90, p < .01), activity (wald = 7.06, p < .01), sociality (wald = 4.13, p < .05), and family income (wald = 4.05, p < .05).05
According to the parameter estimate, compared to the in-danger group (Group 3), the non-problem group (Group 1) was significantly influenced by the following factors: activity (wald = 5.64, p < .05), parenting stress at the 6th measurement point (wald = 7.10, p < .01), and family income (wald = 5.04, p < .05).05
Second, in the case of children in the 'in-danger' risk group who exhibit behavior that reflects an overall lack of social skills (within the dimensions self-control and self-assertion), it is necessary to develop programs in which children can learn to cooperate with peers and exercise self-control.
With the exception of some anthozoan sequences, the orthologous DANGER groups are well defined.
And third, different datasets containing only representative sequences of the different DANGER groups were used (for example, only vertebrate sequences).
Lastly, the level of social skills for the in-danger group was low in all areas.
Hence, this age group was defined as the "in-danger" group.
Regarding capacity for exhibiting assertiveness and responsibility, the lowest scores among the three groups belonged to the in-danger group.
Probably, intervention programs for young children of the in-danger group should be provided to reduce problematic behaviors.
Without early intervention young children of the in-danger group might have a higher possibility of developing juvenile delinquency.
