damage the quality of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damage the quality of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the negative impact on the standard or excellence of something, such as a product, service, or experience. Example: "Excessive use of chemicals can damage the quality of the soil, affecting crop yields."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Those practices damage the quality of their product and waste money.

The New York Times

Would they damage the quality of relationships among students and professors?

The New York Times

If gas prices truly damage the quality of our lives, we have done a remarkable job of hiding it.

The New York Times - Magazine

"The cuts are so deep, it's really going to damage the quality of the orchestra long term".

The New York Times - Arts

Others also fear that universities will encourage academics to specialise in either teaching or research - which they say would ultimately damage the quality of teaching.

The Guardian

In defence of the notion, Trinity Mirror's digital publishing director, David Higgerson, argued that targets need not damage the quality of local journalism.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

Sociologists argue whether instant communication has improved or damaged the quality of life.

The New York Times - Tech

If a low response rate damages the quality of data, he said, the information will be less useful.

The New York Times

Some nutritionists believe that ultrapasteurization damages the quality of milk; many cheese makers won't use it.

The New York Times

Many academics said recent reforms, which encourage universities to treat students as consumers and expand their intake, have damaged the quality of education offered to undergraduates.

The Guardian

The scandal blew up when it turned out that officials had actively damaged the quality of public services by causing traffic jams.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "damage the quality of", ensure that you clearly specify what is causing the damage and what aspect of the quality is being affected to provide a comprehensive understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "damage the quality of" without specifying the affected aspects. Be specific about how the quality is diminished; vague statements weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damage the quality of" functions as a verb phrase expressing causation. It describes an action that negatively impacts or diminishes the characteristics, standards, or excellence of something. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

28%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

12%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "damage the quality of" is a versatile expression used to describe the negative impact on the standard or excellence of something. Ludwig AI analysis, based on a wide range of sources, confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used in various contexts. It is most frequently found in news and media, scientific articles, and formal business documents. When employing this phrase, it is advisable to be specific about the cause of the damage and the aspect of quality affected. Alternatives such as "impair the quality of" or "degrade the quality of" can be used to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

impair the quality of

Replaces "damage" with "impair", suggesting a weakening or deterioration rather than outright harm.

degrade the quality of

Substitutes "damage" with "degrade", implying a gradual decline in quality over time.

diminish the quality of

Uses "diminish" instead of "damage", indicating a reduction in quality or value.

lessen the quality of

Similar to "diminish", but emphasizes making the quality less.

harm the quality of

Replaces "damage" with "harm", suggesting a detrimental effect on quality.

compromise the quality of

Implies that the quality has been put at risk or weakened.

undermine the quality of

Suggests a weakening of the foundations or basis of the quality.

weaken the quality of

Directly states that the quality is becoming weaker or less robust.

corrupt the quality of

Indicates a contamination or spoiling of the original quality.

negatively affect the quality of

A more general phrase indicating an adverse impact on the quality.

FAQs

How can I use "damage the quality of" in a sentence?

You can use "damage the quality of" to describe how something negatively affects the standard or characteristics of something else. For example: "Excessive heat can damage the quality of the product."

What are some alternatives to "damage the quality of"?

You can use alternatives such as "impair the quality of", "degrade the quality of", or "diminish the quality of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "damage the quality of" or "harm the quality of"?

Both "damage the quality of" and "harm the quality of" are acceptable, but "damage" often implies a more gradual or subtle negative effect, while "harm" suggests a more direct or immediate impact.

What's the difference between "damage the quality of" and "reduce the quality of"?

"Damage the quality of" implies that something is actively causing harm to the quality, whereas "reduce the quality of" simply indicates that the quality has decreased, without necessarily specifying a cause.