damage risks

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damage risks" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential threats or hazards that could lead to damage in various contexts, such as insurance, safety assessments, or project management. Example: "The report highlighted several damage risks associated with the construction project, including structural weaknesses and environmental factors."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

The utilisation of cyclone washers is found to reduce damage risks by over 70%.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

The assessments for the long-term damage risks and the indoor climate are applied to every location.

Heritage Science

It was found that damage risks double if a roller door or other dominant opening prematurely fails during a storm.

Engineering Structures

The so-called Limiting Tensile Strain Method (LTSM) idealizes facades to beams and assesses damage risks employing bending and shear strains (Burland and Wroth 1974).

Visualization in Engineering

While waiting for the harvest to be completed, some pastoralists install temporary night-time livestock parks on the hills (ferlo) away from the fields to reduce damage risks.

Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice

Damage risks to the landscape scenery have been identified: Impairment via obstructing visual axes is site-specific, and its risk is well represented in the methodology.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

"It's a comprehensive-system approach," said Karen Durham-Aguilera, a civilian engineer responsible for work on what is now known as the Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System.

The New York Times

To limit such damage, risk managers (employed by the software developers or the merchants themselves) study sales data compiled before the anti-fraud software was implemented.

The Economist

Technology for feature extraction of third-party damage risk.

Petroleum Science

Visualization methods for third-party damage risk based on BLD.

Petroleum Science

Frost damage risk was compared among cultivars and locations.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When assessing potential problems, be specific about the type of "damage risks" you are addressing. For example, instead of stating general "damage risks", specify "structural damage risks" or "environmental damage risks".

Common error

Avoid using "damage risks" as a catch-all term. Instead, break down the risks into specific categories to allow for more effective mitigation strategies.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damage risks" functions primarily as a noun phrase, identifying potential hazards or vulnerabilities that could lead to harm or loss. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is usable in written English and commonly used in contexts discussing potential threats or hazards.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "damage risks" is a common noun phrase used to identify potential hazards or vulnerabilities that could lead to harm or loss. Ludwig AI states the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It is most frequently used in scientific and technical contexts, as well as news and media reports, to assess vulnerabilities and inform risk management strategies. While the phrase is generally acceptable, it's important to be specific about the type of damage being discussed to ensure clear communication and effective mitigation planning. Alternatives such as "risk of damage" or "potential for damage" can be used depending on the desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

risk of damage

Reverses the order of the words, emphasizing the 'risk' aspect.

potential for damage

Uses 'potential' instead of 'risk', focusing on the possibility of damage occurring.

hazard of damage

Substitutes 'risk' with 'hazard', highlighting the dangerous aspect.

threat of damage

Emphasizes the menacing nature of the potential damage.

likelihood of damage

Focuses on the probability of damage occurring.

vulnerability to damage

Highlights susceptibility to damage.

exposure to damage

Focuses on the state of being subjected to potential damage.

probability of loss

Shifts the focus from 'damage' to 'loss', broadening the scope.

danger of destruction

Replaces 'damage' with 'destruction', indicating a more severe outcome.

impairment likelihood

Uses a more formal tone, replacing 'damage' with 'impairment' and framing it as a likelihood.

FAQs

How can I use "damage risks" in a sentence?

You can use "damage risks" to describe potential threats to property, infrastructure, or even reputation. For example: "The assessment identified several "damage risks" associated with the new construction project".

What is the difference between "damage risks" and "risk of damage"?

While the phrases are very similar, "damage risks" functions more like a compound noun, while "risk of damage" emphasizes the 'risk' component. The choice often depends on stylistic preference and the specific context.

Are there situations where it's better to use a different phrase instead of "damage risks"?

Yes, in some contexts, using more specific terms like "structural vulnerabilities", "environmental hazards", or "potential liabilities" might provide clearer communication and greater precision.

Is "damage risks" a formal or informal expression?

The phrase "damage risks" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, though it's commonly used in technical, scientific, or business environments.