Sentence examples for damage liability from inspiring English sources

A10 Assessing the Damage LIABILITY DISPUTE -- The managers and owners of the trade center are asking for $7 billion from insurers.

In fact, the bill would all but end damage liability for the gun industry -- an extraordinary shelter never extended to the tobacco and alcohol industries in legislating controls over the harm their products cause.

No distinction is made between bodily injury or property damage liability, and there is no limit on the number of claims per accident but rather a limit of liability per claim.

There was also political pushback, naturally enough, especially given the threat of draconian private damage liability and the recognition that loose language in TGS could be put to use in upsetting many lucrative "market information" practices on Wall Street.

Third, the policy lists the specific losses that will be paid, such as the loss of the boiler or machinery itself due to accident, expediting expenses, property damage liability, bodily injury liability, defense settlement and supplementary payments, business interruption, outage (interruption of service), power interruption, consequential loss due to spoilage of goods, and furnace explosion.

From 2013 to 2014, in certain Honda Crosstours and Accords that have forward collision and lane departure warnings, there was a 12percentt reduction in the frequency of claims for property damage liability, a 27percentt reduction in bodily injury liability, and a 22percentt reduction in medical payments compared with cars that lacked the equipment but were otherwise the same.

In 1981 the trial jury set the personal damage liabilities at a total of $711,000 for the five defendants, who were agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held this to be "excessive" and ordered the damages reassessed.

2. Petitioner, as a former President of the United States, is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts.

This case now presents the claim that the President of the United States is shielded by absolute immunity from civil damages liability.

The potential damages liability growing out of this publication is thus greater even than the $165,000 which has already been awarded.

Consequently, our holding today need only be that the President is absolutely immune from civil damages liability for his official acts in the absence of explicit affirmative action by Congress.