damage into groups

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damage into groups" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear what is intended by this phrase, as "damage" typically does not combine with "into groups" in a standard context. Example: "The report failed to categorize the damage into groups based on severity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Dividing the index of chronic damage into groups suggested a threshold effect because kidney outcome did not differ significantly for the first 3 groups.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

We divided housing damage into four groups according to the degree of damage to the house; total loss (≥50%), half loss (≥20% but <50%), partial loss (≥3% but <20%) and no damage.

BMJ Open

To avoid the expansion of damage into other physical groups, THs must append their identities to the products during the agreement period of GGK, as detailed in Section 4.2.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

DNA damaging cancer therapeutics can be divided into groups based on their mechanism of action and type of damage induced though there is considerable crossover between classes (Table 2).

Cancer Biology and Therapy

This study recognizes the damage existence, quantification, and location by classifying structural responses data into groups.

Automation in Construction

What used to take 30+ minutes to set up now takes around 10. I say that as a damage-dealer (Warlock); healers and tanks, being more rare, are placed into groups even quicker.

TechCrunch

"We were divided into groups.

Independent

It allows individuals to organize into groups.

The New York Times - Arts

Group users into groups.

TechCrunch

Classify them into groups.

WikiHow

Split into groups.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing damage, use precise language to specify the type and extent of the damage. Instead of "damage into groups", consider alternatives like "categorize the damage" or "classify the damage by severity".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "damage into groups" as it is not grammatically standard. Opt for clearer and more accurate phrases such as "group the damage by type" or "categorize damages based on severity" to ensure your writing is both precise and understandable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damage into groups" attempts to describe a process of categorization, but it is not grammatically correct. Ludwig indicates the phrase is non-standard, suggesting it does not follow typical English usage patterns.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "damage into groups" is grammatically questionable and lacks clarity. Ludwig flags it as non-standard usage. While some examples exist, it's advisable to use more precise alternatives such as "categorize the damage", "classify damages by type", or "group damage based on severity". These alternatives improve clarity and ensure correct grammar, making your writing more effective and understandable. Use more structured phrasing to improve your writings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorize damage by type

Focuses on sorting damage based on its nature or kind.

group damage according to severity

Emphasizes organizing damage based on its intensity or impact.

classify damage by extent

Highlights sorting damage based on its range or scope.

sort damage based on impact

Focuses on arranging damage based on its effect or consequence.

divide damage by cause

Emphasizes separating damage based on its origin or reason.

organize damage by location

Highlights arranging damage based on its spatial distribution.

assess damage in categories

Focuses on evaluating damage within predefined groups.

analyze damage by type

Emphasizes examining damage based on its nature.

report damage by area

Highlights documenting damage based on specific regions.

inventory damage by item

Focuses on cataloging damage on an individual item basis.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "damage into groups" to make it grammatically correct?

Instead of "damage into groups", consider using phrases like "categorize the "damage by type"", "classify damage according to severity", or "group damage based on its extent" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.

What is a more appropriate way to describe organizing damage based on its severity?

A more appropriate way to describe organizing damage based on severity is to say "group the damage according to severity" or "categorize the damage by level of impact". These alternatives are clearer and more grammatically sound than "damage into groups".

Is "damage into groups" considered formal English?

No, "damage into groups" is not considered formal English. It's better to use more precise and grammatically correct phrases like "categorize the "damage by location"" or "classify the damage based on its cause" in formal contexts.

What are some alternative expressions for sorting different types of damage?

Instead of saying "damage into groups", you can use alternative expressions like "classify the damage by type", "organize damages by area", or "sort damage by source". These phrases provide a more specific and clearer description.