Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
For the past three weeks, they have been entering daily meter readings on tidystreet.org, to build up a picture of each household's energy use.
The greatest power to reset the organism's daily meter lay in the blues, with a precipitous decline into the greens and a modest boost in the reds.
Of the 276 adolescents, 158 provided meters for downloading; their daily BGM frequency was correlated with (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001) and similar to their self-report (daily meter mean 4.15 and self-report mean 4.26).
Similar(57)
Drag the lifetime and daily relationship meter up to 100 on 2 different Sims.
The constancy test performed as part of daily radionuclide activity meter quality control was used as an indicator of radionuclide activity meter instrumentation variability.
To assess this, we used results of daily radionuclide activity meter constancy measurements.
We also collected mean 3-day pedometer readings (Accusplit Eagle Accusplitt, Inc., Livermore, CA) and mean daily blood glucose meter checks.
After adjustment for age, the only other baseline factor associated with successful use after 6 months was the frequency of self-reported prestudy daily blood glucose meter measurements.
As shown in Table 1, CGM use averaging ≥6.0 days/week in month 6 was associated with age (highest in adults, P < 0.001 in a multivariate model) and frequency of self-reported prestudy daily blood glucose meter measurements (P < 0.001).
There was a trend toward baseline A1C <7.0% being associated with greater CGM use in an unadjusted model but not after adjustment for age and frequency of prestudy daily blood glucose meter measurements.
Finally, both older and younger participants showed improved frequency of self-reported self-care, daily blood glucose meter checks, depressive symptoms, diabetes-related quality of life, diabetes-related distress, frustration with self-care, diabetes-specific self-efficacy, and emotional coping postintervention (Supplementary Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com