Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(47)
The result may be useful for the construction of complete bouncing cosmologies like the cyclic model.
Of course, there are reasons to be skeptical of the cyclic model, too.
Still, the cyclic model appears to be a viable competitor to inflation.
The cyclic model, however, would produce a slightly lopsided, non-Gaussian distribution, with more cold spots than hot.
If the cyclic model is correct, the universe would stop expanding about a trillion years from now, then slowly contract for another 10 billion years.
If their distribution turns out to be more non-Gaussian than inflation predicts, the case for the cyclic model will be strengthened.
Similar(13)
We contrast these results with those for scale-free cyclic models.
The proposed approach takes the application of 4D technology beyond the construction phase and demonstrates its effectiveness for life cyclic modeling and visualization of infrastructures' data including condition assessments.
Many similarities to and some differences with previous cyclic models are identified.
Author(s): Lehners, Jean-Luc; Steinhardt, Paul J. Abstract: We show that results from the Planck satellite reported in 2013 are consistent with cyclic models of the Universe for natural parameter ranges (i.e. order unity dimensionless coefficients), assuming the standard entropic mechanism for generating curvature perturbations.
By contrast, the new results are consistent with the simplest versions of ekpyrotic cyclic models in which the Universe is smoothed and flattened during a period of slow contraction followed by a bounce, and another promising bouncing theory, anamorphic cosmology, has been proposed that can produce distinctive predictions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com