Peaks were called using Model-based Analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS, v1.4.2) using the following parameters, band width = 300, and p-value cut off of 1.00e-05 relatove to a whole mouse genome data set generated from wild type FVB/N mouse genomic DNA as a control.
molecular weight cut off.
The red line in Fig. 14a represents the cut-off relative permittivity of 12.0.
In addition, the condition map based on the dual cut-off relative permittivity criteria showed a good agreement with the attenuation method, in comparison to that based on the conventional single cut-off relative permittivity criteria in Korea expressways. .
On the contrary, Fig. 14b shows a concrete condition map based on a dual cut-off relative permittivity: regions were judged to be damaged when the cut-off relative permittivity was lower than 6.0 or higher than 11.0.
In addition, the condition map based on the dual cut-off relative permittivity criteria showed a good agreement with the attenuation method, in comparison to that based on the conventional single cut-off relative permittivity criteria in Korea expressways.
a cut-off relative permittivity over 12, b cut-off relative permittivity under 6 and over 11, and c depthcorrected attenuation map based on the reflection from the top rebars.
Furthermore, the damaged areas calculated from the single cut-off relative permittivity criteria were smaller than those determined by visual inspection.
However, some areas of lane 2 of span 3 of JB-3N, where damages were most concentrated, and some other areas in JB-3S, were not accurately classified as damaged areas by the current single cut-off relative permittivity criteria.
It is noteworthy that the damaged areas estimated by the dual cut-off relative permittivity criteria are larger than those judged by visual inspection (especially on spans 4 and 5 on JB-3N).
