Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
One of the interesting features is that the current model is based on the NIST-REFPROP database for refrigerants properties calculations.
The current model is based on ply failure mechanisms (fiber and inter-fiber failures) incorporating energetic considerations into the progressive damage evolution.
Our current model is based on SMT but it would be valuable to explore how the results differ under the assumption of TOFT.
Similar(57)
First, the current model was based on data assembled at a single institution; therefore, the validity of this model should be verified before its application to patients from other populations or institutions.
This current model was based on an existing energy-based model for bevel-tipped needles, to which work of actuation was included in calculating the system energy.
The slight difference in shape may be explained by the current model being based on the Schumacher growth function with data from 25 stands, while the Herbert et al. model was based on the von Bertalanffy-Richards growth function using data from only two highly stocked stands.
However, it is important to remember that the current model was based on solid pathology and therefore optimized for specificity.
The current model was based on histopathologic and clinical chemistry data and performs best on data comparable to the training data.
Researches and current models are based on the assumption that it is caused by alterations in the nociceptive threshold and central sensitisation in susceptible individuals [13, 14].
Most of current models are based on the experience of transactions in the past with a given partner or on reputation of a partner from other agents in the system.
While the current models are based on the premise that human capital investments will be increased by the opportunity to migrate, the present estimation results suggest that an increase in human capital could also be triggered by the positive externality migration has on educational aspirations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com