Sentence examples for cup migration from inspiring English sources

Intrapelvic acetabular cup migration is a rare but serious complication, which can occur after cup loosening following total hip arthroplasty.

There was no significant difference in either presence or volume of the osteolytic lesions, cup migration or functional outcomes (OHS) between the groups.

No unstable implants were noted; all implant fixation interfaces were classified as "stable bone ingrown," and the cup migration rate was zero.

It is well known that cup loosening produces cup migration and bone loss in both cemented [14] and uncemented [6, 16] THA.

According to Bizot [14] loosening of the socket was defined as cup migration exceeding 3 mm, angular rotation exceeding 3° or a continuous radiolucent line wider than 2 mm according to the zones described by DeLee and Charnley [15].

Any cup migration or tilting was also recorded.

When comparing the proximal cup migrations that we found reported here to the classification by Pijls et al. (2012), we identified 17 cups "at risk" of revision (range 0.24 0.77) and 7 cups with "unacceptable" migrations (range 1.01 1.34).

Between the second and the fifth year, 4 patients had cup migrations above the TT detection limit (0.76 mm), with a mean of 1.47 (range 0.81 2.36) mm, and these cup migrations (n = 4) were significantly different from the migrations of cups (n = 31) that migrated below the detection limit (p < 0.001).

Patients with cup migrations above the recommendations by Nieuwenhuijse et al. (2012) and Pjils et al. (2012) were asymptomatic and had low serum metal ion levels.

However, there was no difference in serum metal ion levels were similar in patients with and without measurable cup migrations (p = 0.61).

Between the second and the fifth year, 5 stems and 4 cups (in 8 patients) had migrations above the TT detection limit, yet no stem migrated more than 1 mm TT and no cup migrated more than 2.36 mm TT, and these 8 patients were asymptomatic.