Sentence examples for cumulative phone from inspiring English sources

Predicted rates were substantially more than observed rates if we applied the relative risks of the Swedish study 10 to the 1992-6 baseline rates (and took account of the distribution by latency periods and cumulative phone use reported), and if we accounted for the increasing per capita prevalence of mobile phone use (figs 3-4, table 5).

Cumulative phone use for > 85 hr, 10 years before case diagnosis, gave ORs for brain tumors of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1 3.2) and 3.0 (95% CI, 0.6 14.9), respectively, for analog and cordless phones, but ORs were not increased for digital phones.

Notwithstanding the inherent unreliability of recalled amount of use, the only cumulative mobile phone exposure measures available in the Interphone study were duration and amount.

There was no trend in risk with lifetime cumulative hours of phone use or cumulative number of calls (Table 2).

No trend in risk was found in relation to cumulative hours of phone use or number of calls.

Results were similar if we used the Swedish study's "ever versus never use" data 10 rather than the data taking account of cumulative hours of phone use (results not shown).

The second model used was slightly more sophisticated, and used estimates of relative risk for specific classes of latency periods and cumulative hours of phone use reported by the Swedish study 10 and Interphone study.

Risk of acoustic neuroma ipsilateral to side of handedness was nonsignificantly raised after 10 or more cumulative years of phone use – compatible with, but not giving strong support to, the results on reported side of use.

We assumed that the cumulative hours of phone use in the US population had the same distribution as that in the control groups in each study, as shown in tables 2-4.

17 However, none of these studies 13141517 17 assessed the potential effect of latency or possible variation in excess relative risk with the cumulative duration of phone use on trends in brain cancer incidence.

Based on relative risks of glioma by tumour latency and cumulative hours of phone use in the Swedish study, predicted rates should have been at least 40% higher than observed rates in 2008.