Sentence examples for cue quality from inspiring English sources

These effects did not vary as a function of cue quality.

However, cue quality and/or tone identity ('what' information) may further modulate visual-to- auditory predictions.

This need not imply that masculinity is a reliable cue of "quality", however, as testosterone levels may be responsive to quality-independent factors such as the frequency of aggression in the local population (Qvanstrom and Forsgren 1998) and individual (developmental) exposure to conflict (Mazur and Booth 1998; Archer 2009).

However, because the playing of such material depended on a person's ability to place a phonograph needle onto a record at just the right time and in just the right place and to adjust the phonograph's volume on cue, the quality of these effects was often uneven.

In this work we examine the interactive effect of packaging design and explicit packaging cues on quality inferences.

Besides affecting host search cues, plant quality is also known to affect herbivore immunocompetence and switching to an alternate plant may affect resistance to parasitoid attack.

However, acoustic cues to quality and individuality seem in several mammalian species to be linked to both source and filter characteristics [ 21, 22].

As they are more reliable cues to quality than to individuality, they may not be used by conspecifics to recognize a given male from one year to another, but potentially used by both sexes to assess male quality during each breeding season.

The result that males discriminated between individual social partners presented at 60 p but not at 15 p or 30 p provides some evidence that, for courting pigeons, the cues advertising quality and promoting preferential responding lie somewhere around the order of 30 Hz (thereby requiring 60 p IPR to represent the motion).

Our results show that evolution favours phenotypic quality cues over individuality cues in fallow buck groans, with quality cues being more reliable than individuality cues over time.

We report a study that manipulated the social validation of medical statements within online forum posts in a 2 (quality cue: yes vs. no) × 2 (quantity cue: yes vs. no) within-subjects design (N = 78).