Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
Laboratory analysis showed that there were accompanying marked increases in chromium-reducible sulfide (CRS) across the morphological boundary (from essentially 0% above the boundary to >1% below the boundary, over distances generally ≤10 cm), indicating that the morphological boundary determined in the field was accurate.
The mean percentage of conditioned responses (CRs) across the 10 days of trace conditioning for each experimental group is illustrated in Fig. 2D.
Figure 2 depicts some raw records (Fig. 2A, B) and the mean percentage of CRs across the 5 days of trace (Fig. 2C) and delay (Fig. 2D) conditioning for the two (wild-type and TgIE96) experimental groups.
As illustrated in Figure 4D, fEPSP slopes evoked in previously ZIP-injected mice were linearly related (r = 0.73; P<0.0001) to the percentage of CRs across conditioning sessions (slope = 0.57), but were not for the scr-ZIP injected group (r = 0.17; P = 0.09).
The development of CRs across trials is an indication of how well the participants learned.
Thus for the main analysis we looked at the number of CRs across blocks of ten paired trials to determine if learning differed across groups.
Similar(51)
In addition, we calculated the correlation coefficient of each probe set (Cr) across the time-series of two sets of biological replicates in flag leaves and seedling leaves (Figure 1B and Figure S1B, respectively).
There was no general tendency for genes increased by CR across tissues to be decreased by aging, and likewise, genes decreased by CR across tissues were not disproportionately increased by aging.
One consistent phenotype of CR across animal models is the reduction of body weight and particularly body fat.
In the NEPA group, the percentage of patients with an overall CR across cycles was similar for the patients receiving HEC (79%91%%) and MEC (80%–93%).
Rather, the effect of CR across mouse strains (particularly the ILSXISS) ranged from decreasing or having no effect to increasing lifespan, with an average increase of only ~15%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com