crosswalk with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "crosswalk with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a crosswalk that is associated with something else, but it lacks context to be usable. Example: "The city plans to install a new crosswalk with improved lighting for pedestrian safety."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

Telephone interview for cognitive status: Creating a crosswalk with the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Harvard University

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Creating a Crosswalk with the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Harvard University

Median strips were rebuilt, and a bicycle lane was added, as well as an enhanced crosswalk with a countdown signal to "accommodate  slow-moving pedestrians," she said.

The New York Times

One man was shuffling across the crosswalk with a small dog and stopped at the other side to squint at my car.

The New York Times

One crosswalk with traffic signals would save more lives, and in all likelihood cost less money, than this hurtful prosecution cost the taxpayers of Georgia.

The Washington Post

Of those injured on the street, 44 percent used a crosswalk, with the signal, compared with 23 percent who crossed midblock and 9 percent who crossed against the signal.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

I see so many motorists' infractions every day, like talking on handheld cellphones and blocking crosswalks with impunity.

The New York Times

Other planned enhancements include solar in-pavement lights, well-marked and well-lit crosswalks with curb extensions, and a speed table at the Simmons Hall crosswalk.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The project will provide motorists with a repaved — albeit narrower — roadway, with larger medians, fewer left turn lanes, new crosswalks with wider sidewalks and improved pedestrian signals.

The New York Times

I do, but then I think of the Saturdays dominated by sports schedules, the windswept winter playgrounds, the kids hit by cars in crosswalks, with the light.

The New Yorker

The plan would create crosswalks with their own traffic lights on Fifth Avenue and the Avenue of the Americas, about 60 feet away from where the avenues intersect with 50th Street.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a crosswalk's features, consider using more precise prepositions like "featuring", "alongside", or "equipped with" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "with" loosely when describing crosswalk attributes. Instead of saying "crosswalk with lights", specify the type of integration: "crosswalk featuring illuminated signals" is more informative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "crosswalk with" functions primarily as a descriptive element, attempting to specify attributes or associated features of a crosswalk. However, Ludwig AI identifies this construction as grammatically questionable, which affects the clarity and precision of the description.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "crosswalk with" is used to describe attributes or associated features, it is generally considered grammatically questionable and often lacks precision. Ludwig AI analysis suggests that rephrasing with more descriptive prepositions—such as "featuring", "alongside", or "equipped with"—can significantly improve clarity. Although the phrase appears across various contexts, authoritative sources tend toward more specific language, which enhances the quality of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

crosswalk featuring

Specifies a prominent attribute or design element of the crosswalk.

crosswalk alongside

Indicates the crosswalk's location relative to another element.

crosswalk including

Highlights particular features or attributes incorporated into the crosswalk's design.

crosswalk equipped with

Emphasizes specific functionalities or additions to the crosswalk.

crosswalk that has

Emphasizes the possession of a particular characteristic or feature by the crosswalk.

crosswalk connected to

Highlights a physical or conceptual link between the crosswalk and another element.

crosswalk integrated with

Signifies a seamless incorporation of the crosswalk into a broader system or environment.

crosswalk combined with

Indicates the presence of the crosswalk as part of a larger, more complex arrangement or design.

crosswalk associated with

Highlights that the crosswalk is related to a specific place or item.

crosswalk complemented by

Shows that the crosswalk is enhanced or completed by another element.

FAQs

How can I accurately describe a crosswalk's features?

Instead of using the phrase "crosswalk with", consider more specific alternatives like "crosswalk featuring", "crosswalk alongside", or "crosswalk equipped with" depending on the relationship you want to express.

What prepositions can replace "with" when describing a crosswalk?

Depending on the context, "featuring", "alongside", "equipped with", and "integrated with" can offer more precise descriptions than simply using "with".

Is it grammatically correct to use "crosswalk with"?

While sometimes used, the phrase "crosswalk with" can be vague. Rephrasing with more descriptive prepositions like "crosswalk featuring", "crosswalk alongside", or "crosswalk equipped with" often provides greater clarity.

What's a better way to describe a crosswalk that includes specific features?

Instead of a general phrase like "crosswalk with lights", try "crosswalk featuring LED lights" or "crosswalk equipped with pedestrian signals" for more descriptive precision.