Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
In contrast, all the limbs crossed over obstacle normally when the ispilesional forelimb was the first to encounter the obstacle.
In steps in which the leading contralesional forelimb normally performed obstacle crossing, the other limbs also crossed over obstacle normally (Fig.6C).
An asymmetrical deficit in limbs force production appears to be not involved in deficit because contralesional limbs normally crossed over obstacle when they were the second to encounter the obstacle.
Similar(57)
In addition, the contralesional forelimb which badly performs obstacle crossing after striatal lesion (our results) was reported to cross over obstacle normally after pyramidal lesions [45].
Our results argue that the striatum of one hemisphere controls kinematics of contralateral limbs during stereotyped locomotion and plays a prominent role in the selection of the right motor program so that these limbs successfully cross over obstacle.
In conclusion, our results argue that the striatum of one hemisphere controls kinematics of contralateral limbs during stereotyped locomotion and plays a prominent role in the selection of the right motor program so that these limbs successfully cross over obstacle.
Learn techniques for crossing over obstacles.
On the contrary, limb 3 (the leading contralesional hindlimb) either stepped on the obstacle, successfully crossed over the obstacle, or took an extra step before passing over the obstacle without touching it (see bottom panel of Fig. 6B).
In this situation, limb 1 either stepped on the obstacle and remained for varying durations on the obstacle (unsuccessful crossings, Fig 6B) or crossed over the obstacle normally (successful crossing, Fig 6C).
When limb 1 badly performed obstacle crossing, limb 2 (forelimb ipsilateral to the lesion) and limb 4 (hindlimb ipsilateral to the lesion) successfully crossed over the obstacle.
On the contrary, maximal elevation of limbs 3 and 4 was reached before and after the tip of the paw had crossed over the obstacle, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com