cross when compared

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross when compared" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete or unclear expression that lacks context for proper usage. Example: "The results of the two studies were cross when compared, leading to confusion about the findings."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

(Knights of the Thistle and of the Garter rank as Knights Grand Cross when compared with other orders and thus may be granted the use of supporters with their arms).

Encyclopedia Britannica

(Knights of the Garter and of the Thistle rank as Knights Grand Cross when compared with other orders and thus may be granted the use of supporters with their arms).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The karyotype × inbreeding interaction arises from the somewhat different behaviour between Ost/Ost and O3+4/O3+4 karyotypes on one side, and O3+4+8/O3+4+8 on the other: for the first two karyotypes Tp was slightly higher in inbred crosses when compared to their outbred counterparts, whereas the opposite was true for the O3+4+8/O3+4+8 karyotype.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

It is clear that the plant extract significantly decreased the locomotor activity of mice in open field and hole cross tests when compared to the control (p���< 0.05).

Clinical Phytoscience

We conclude that CmCGG methylation patterns are largely unchanged in isogenic reciprocal F1 triploids generated in either cross direction (when compared with diploids).

DNA Research

As natural selection intensities guide the introgression process, the reduced selection intensity of the F2 cross type when compared to that of the BCw may suggest that selection favors introgression via the BCw route (Table 4).

Evolutionary Applications

The use of social media traces as a proxy for human movements has been extensively investigated in the literature [34 38], however, a comprehensive and quantitative assessment of their predictive power at different granularities and under cross-validation when compared out-of-sample against official mobility data was still lacking.

EPJ Data Science

As shown in Figure 3B, both RNAs had a similar effect in reducing the 40 kDa cross-linking when compared with the wild type D90.

Plosone

Histological staining for lignin (using acidic phloroglucinol) showed that both lines had reduced lignin in stem-cross sections when compared to wild-type BTx623.

BMC Plant Biology

MWM study showed that RSG only neither increased escape latency nor decreased platform crossing times when compared with the control group and 3(d)).

BioMed Research International

There is no significant difference between the frequency of sister and non-sister spores in the sgs1-top3-id/sgs1Δ cross (ADA 12) when compared to wild type (Table 4).

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use more established comparative phrases like "compared to" or "in comparison to" for clarity and grammatical correctness. These alternatives are widely accepted and understood in both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using incomplete or grammatically unsound phrases such as "cross when compared". Always ensure that your comparative statements are clear, complete, and follow standard English grammar rules to prevent misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross when compared" functions as part of a relative clause, attempting to provide a comparative context. However, it's grammatically unconventional and not recognized in standard English. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is an incomplete or unclear expression.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

Encyclopedias

20%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cross when compared" is grammatically incorrect and uncommon in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies it as an incomplete expression. While it appears sporadically across various domains like science, encyclopedias, and news, its usage is limited. For clarity and correctness, it's best to use established comparative phrases such as "compared to", "in comparison to", or "when contrasted with". Always prioritize grammatical accuracy to avoid potential misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared to

This is a more direct and grammatically standard way to indicate a comparison.

when contrasted with

Offers a more formal tone, emphasizing the differences being highlighted.

in comparison to

Similar to "compared to", but provides a slightly more elaborate structure.

relative to

Suggests a comparison that is proportional or dependent on something else.

by comparison with

Emphasizes the act of comparing as a method of understanding differences.

as opposed to

Highlights a direct opposition or contrast between two things.

juxtaposed with

Implies placing two elements side by side to highlight their differences.

assessed against

Focuses on evaluating something based on a specific standard or benchmark.

weighed against

Indicates a careful consideration of the merits and drawbacks of each option.

versus

A concise way to indicate a direct comparison or competition.

FAQs

What are some better ways to say "cross when compared"?

You can use more grammatically correct and widely accepted alternatives like "compared to", "in comparison to", or "when contrasted with" to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Is "cross when compared" grammatically correct?

No, "cross when compared" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use established phrases like "compared to" or "in relation to".

In what contexts might I encounter the phrase "cross when compared"?

While not grammatically standard, "cross when compared" might occasionally appear in informal writing or speech, or in specialized contexts where the intended meaning is clear from the surrounding text. However, it's generally best to avoid this phrase in formal writing.

What's the difference between "cross when compared" and "compared to"?

"Cross when compared" is not a standard or grammatically correct phrase. "Compared to" is a standard phrase used to indicate a comparison between two or more things.