cross voices

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross voices" is not commonly used in written English and may not be easily understood without context.
It could be used to describe conflicting opinions or sounds, but clarity may be lacking without additional information. Example: "During the debate, there were many cross voices that made it difficult to reach a consensus."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

She climbed the tower of St Pancras hotel to talk to Harry Handelsman, a permanent resident there, and revisited the King's Cross Voices project, which Camden council ran a few years ago, trawling through their audio archive and transcripts, as well as working with oral historian Alan Dein.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

All this constituted a different kind of harmony and counterpoint, one that had little to do with Mozart's major-minor harmonies, crossing voices and bar lines.

The New York Times - Arts

Mozart's "Jupiter" Symphony was driven almost uncomfortably in the outer movements, but the extraordinary separation of crossing voices (this was Mozart in his "I've discovered Bach" phase) said much about the qualities of the Boston Symphony.

The New York Times - Arts

Ligeti's part songs, which included "Papaine" and "Magany," were quieter but infinitely more potent, with a magical spilling-over of crossing voices, at once harmonious and ambiguously at odds.

The New York Times - Arts

A few instruments join the singers, but the compositions revolve around their blended, cross-cultural voices.

The New York Times - Arts

Are you sure you got this right?" said the cross American voice.

The Guardian - Books

At King's Cross, passengers voiced concern at news of the increase.

The Guardian - Money

Lorie Van Auken, whose husband, Kenneth Van Auken, died in the World Trade Center, said she noticed clicks on her home phone line for months after the attacks and overheard cross-talking voices.

The New York Times

Cross platform voice chat is supported however.

TechCrunch

Batwoman appears in the Batman: The Brave and the Bold episode "The Criss Cross Conspiracy!", voiced by Vanessa Marshall.

Wikipedia

Table 6 also shows the cross-language voice-tag application performances of the sequential and batch mode voice-to-phoneme conversion algorithms, where the acoustic models are trained on the seven evaluation languages while the voice-tags are created and applied on American English, a distinct target language.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, consider replacing "cross voices" with more precise alternatives like "conflicting opinions" or "overlapping dialogues" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "cross voices" to describe a pleasing blend of voices. The phrase often implies conflict or interference. Instead, use terms like "harmonizing voices" or "blended voices" to convey a positive combination.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross voices" functions as a noun phrase, though its grammatical correctness is questionable. Ludwig AI suggests that its meaning may not be easily understood without context and recommends using alternatives such as "conflicting voices" or "divergent opinions".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cross voices" is an uncommon expression that generally suggests conflicting, overlapping, or interfering opinions or sounds. Ludwig AI indicates that it may lack clarity without sufficient context and should be used cautiously. While it appears in various sources, including news and science, more specific and established alternatives such as "conflicting opinions" or "overlapping voices" are typically preferred for enhanced clarity and grammatical correctness. When in doubt, opting for these alternatives can help avoid ambiguity and improve the overall effectiveness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

voices in conflict

Directly addresses the state of opposition or struggle between different opinions.

voices clashing

Highlights a harsh or jarring opposition between voices.

conflicting opinions

Focuses on the disagreement in viewpoints rather than the voices themselves.

divergent viewpoints

Emphasizes the differing nature of the opinions being expressed.

discordant voices

Emphasizes the lack of harmony between the voices.

overlapping voices

Highlights the simultaneity of the voices, potentially creating confusion.

voices intertwined

Describes voices that are closely connected or mixed together, possibly in a confusing manner.

voices intermingling

Similar to intertwined, but suggests a more fluid and less structured blending of voices.

voices blending

Suggests a harmonious combination of voices, in contrast to the potential conflict implied by "cross voices".

multiple perspectives

Shifts the focus from the auditory aspect to the diversity of viewpoints.

FAQs

What does "cross voices" mean?

The meaning of "cross voices" is not immediately clear and often depends on context. It can suggest conflicting opinions, overlapping speech, or interference in communication. For clarity, consider using more specific alternatives.

What can I say instead of "cross voices" to describe disagreement?

You can use alternatives like "conflicting opinions", "discordant voices", or "voices in conflict" depending on the specific nature of the disagreement.

Is "cross voices" grammatically correct?

While not strictly ungrammatical, "cross voices" is uncommon and may sound awkward. It's generally better to use more established phrases like "conflicting opinions" or "overlapping voices".

How can I use "cross voices" in a sentence?

While uncommon, you might use "cross voices" to describe a situation where multiple people are speaking simultaneously and interfering with each other, but more descriptive alternatives are generally preferred.