cross comparison between

USAGE SUMMARY

"cross comparison" is a valid term in written English that is used when comparing two variables or concepts in order to draw conclusions.
For example, "We will conduct a cross comparison between two different types of cars in order to determine which is the more efficient model."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Cross comparison between the two transects show that conversion from the shallow-rooted to deep-rooted vegetation resulted in a significant reduction of groundwater recharge (p < 0.05) which reduced to virtually zero when the rooting depth is deeper than 15 m.

Journal of Hydrology

Cross comparison between studies is also problematic.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

At the district level, the level of complexity of each activity was determined by cross comparison between activities (Table  9, below).

BMC Health Services Research

TPM is preferred over other expression metrics as it is independent of mean expressed transcript length, thus allowing for cross comparison between multiple samples [ 74, 80, 82].

BMC Genomics

Importantly, our data leveraged against recently published transcriptomes for FACS-purified human islet populations will now facilitate routine cross comparison between mouse and human alpha and beta cell transcriptomes.

BMC Genomics

The resulting lists of the genes were examined further by cross comparison between experiments using TIGR MEV [ 43], TIGR, Rockville, MD) using Euclidean distance and hierarchical clustering with average linkage clustering method.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

This approach will allow cross comparison of data between different chlamydial strains and host cells.

Plosone

The input data to DIALIGN is a series of 1-byte characters that represent either DNA or protein strands of query and reference sequences for comparison (cross comparisons between DNA strands and protein strands are never made).

Journal of Cloud Computing

The proteins selected for MRM were mainly found around the centroid (see Additional file 2) and below the centroid (see Additional file 2) when cross comparisons between glycerol concentrations and/or between growth phases were used, respectively.

AMB Express

Cross comparisons between heterozygous and mutant showed more changes than internal comparisons at each cutoff in both green and white cells.

Plosone

We performed cross comparisons between the three lists so obtained by intersecting those lists.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cross comparison between", clearly define the criteria for comparison to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using redundant phrases like "comparing between" after using "cross comparison"; instead, directly state what is being compared (e.g., "cross comparison of methods" rather than "cross comparison between methods").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross comparison between" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the act of comparing two or more distinct entities or data sets to identify similarities, differences, or correlations. Ludwig AI validates its role in academic and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "cross comparison between" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe the act of comparing multiple distinct entities. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, particularly in scientific and academic writing. While alternatives like "comparative analysis" exist, "cross comparison between" is suitable when emphasizing a direct comparison of different elements. Remember to clearly define comparison criteria and avoid redundancy. The phrase, although correct, has uncommon usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

comparative analysis of

Focuses on the analysis aspect, implying a structured examination of similarities and differences.

inter comparison of

Highlights the mutual comparison among multiple items or datasets.

comparative study of

Emphasizes a research-oriented comparison, often involving detailed investigation.

contrast between

Highlights the differences and dissimilarities between the subjects being examined.

correlation analysis between

Focuses on identifying statistical relationships and dependencies.

differential analysis of

Underscores the analytical process of identifying the variations.

side-by-side comparison of

Indicates a direct, adjacent comparison, typically for highlighting contrasts.

mutual comparison of

Highlights that each element is being used as a point of comparison for the others involved.

integrated comparison of

Indicates a comparison that's part of a larger, more comprehensive study.

comparative assessment of

Implies a valuation or judgment is being made as a result of the comparison.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "cross comparison between" in a sentence?

To effectively use "cross comparison between", clearly specify the items being compared and the basis for comparison. For example, "A cross comparison between the two datasets revealed significant discrepancies."

What are some alternatives to "cross comparison between"?

You can use alternatives such as "comparative analysis of", "comparative study of", or "contrast between" depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "cross comparison" and "comparison"?

"Cross comparison" implies a specific type of comparison involving multiple, distinct elements or datasets, whereas "comparison" is a more general term. Using "cross" highlights that you're looking at relationships between different items.

When is it appropriate to use "cross comparison between" in academic writing?

It is appropriate when you are presenting a structured analysis that contrasts or correlates different sets of data, methods, or findings. Ensure your analysis is rigorous and clearly articulates the parameters of comparison.