cross compared the

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross compared the" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey the idea of comparing two or more items across different contexts or datasets, but the phrasing is awkward and not commonly used. Example: "The researchers cross compared the data from multiple studies to identify trends."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Cross compared the conversation to sitting around with friends, an ice cream truck drives by and someone says, "Hey I would like ice cream!" and then the next thing you know, they are gone, you're going to assume they went after the ice cream.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

To evaluate patients with congenital superior oblique palsy (SOP) by classifying them according to their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and cross-comparing the clinical characteristics of each group.

Ophthalmology

Next, we cross-compare the performance of the link and system level simulators.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

This is demonstrated in Fig. 6, where we cross-compare the achievable rate, as defined in (18) and (19), and the actual throughput of SC-FDM and OFDM transmission as obtained by the Vienna LTE-A Uplink Simulator.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Accordingly, in this study, we cross-compared the CO values and their changes in a critically ill patient cohort in whom active changes in blood volume, vasomotor tone and contractility were induced by specific therapies.

Critical Care

To further distinguish direct effects of Esg on gene transcription from indirect effects, we cross-compared the datasets of Esg-Dam binding targets, genes upregulated upon esg ts  >  esg RNAi and genes downregulated in whole midguts upon MyoIA ts  >  UAS-esg expression.

EMBO Journal

kappa statistics were used to cross-compare the results of rapid tests and EIA.

BMC Infectious Diseases

This should allow the reader to more easily cross-compare the enrichments obtained for different phylogenetic categories, CRMs versus singletons and TF-specific enrichments obtained.

eLife

For downstream analysis, researchers can compare samples based on peptide or protein content, or cross-compare the proteins from various analyses such as comparing a MudPIT to an iTRAQ analysis.

Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics

We collected the common differential meta-B genes infected by EBV between the two tumors by cross-comparing the gene sets obtained after analyzing the two data sets using BRB ArrayTools.

BMC Genomics

When cross-comparing the WOA responses with the previously published stress responses, we found genes up-regulated by the SCFAs acetic, propionic, and butyric to be significantly overlapping with genes down-regulated by nitrosative stress and low pH, most especially at T2.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for clearer and more standard English phrasing such as "compared across", "cross-referenced", or "contrasted" for improved readability and comprehension.

Common error

Using non-standard phrases like "cross compared the" can confuse your audience. Always prioritize clarity by using established grammatical structures and vocabulary.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross compared the" is intended to function as a verb phrase, aiming to describe an action of comparing something across different elements or datasets. However, Ludwig AI indicates this is not a standard usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cross compared the" is not a standard or grammatically correct expression in English. Ludwig AI identifies it as an awkward phrasing. Although it appears occasionally in various contexts, especially scientific and news media, it's recommended to use clearer and more accepted alternatives such as "compared across", "cross-referenced the", or "contrasted the" for better clarity and professionalism in writing. Always prioritize using established grammatical structures to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared across

This alternative offers a more concise and grammatically standard way to express comparison between different entities or datasets.

cross-referenced the

This alternative is suitable when checking different sources of information against each other for consistency and accuracy.

contrasted the

This implies a focus on highlighting the differences between the items being considered.

compared and contrasted

This is a more comprehensive way to express that both similarities and differences were examined.

made a comparison of

This option uses a more formal tone, suitable for academic or technical writing.

undertook a comparative analysis of

A formal and detailed way of expressing a thorough examination of multiple items for comparison.

evaluated in relation to

This implies assessing the significance or value of something by comparing it to a specific standard or benchmark.

compared in terms of

This is helpful when comparing specific characteristics or attributes.

correlated with

This alternative highlights the degree to which two or more attributes tend to vary together.

drew parallels between

This option is useful for pointing out similarities between seemingly distinct concepts or items.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "cross compared the"?

Instead of "cross compared the", consider using phrases like "compared across", "cross-referenced the", or "contrasted the" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "cross compared the" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "cross compared the" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use more common and accepted alternatives.

When can I use "compared across" instead of "cross compared the"?

You can use "compared across" in most situations where you intend to express a comparison between different elements or datasets. It offers a clearer and more standard way to convey the intended meaning.

What is the difference between "cross-referenced the" and "cross compared the"?

"Cross-referenced the" implies checking different sources against each other, while "cross compared the" (although non-standard) might suggest a broader comparison. It's better to use "compared across" in most contexts.