Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

cross compared between

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross compared between" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct expression would be "cross-compare" or "compare across." Example: "The data was cross-compared between the two studies to identify any discrepancies."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Microarray profiling of mRNA samples was normalized with the internal endogenous control and cross-compared between the two groups.

On average, snails grew larger when fed on plants from between-population crosses compared to plants from within-population crosses indicating lower resistance of plants from between-population crosses, and therefore outbreeding depression (Table 1, Fig. 1b).

Science

Plosone

However, the snails grew larger when fed on plants from between-population crosses compared to when feeding on within-population crosses.

Science

Plosone

To examine spatial changes in lamin A the distributions of curvature and intensity in cross sections were compared between fresh and senescent cells.

Science

Aging

The grading of the images was then cross-tabulated and compared between the two imaging modalities.

By cross comparing their genomic structures, we can elucidate the cause of any differences in the phenotype between two strains.

Raman intensities were compared between cross-AgNW films and drop-casted AgNW films incubated in 100 mM benzenethiol (Fig. 4).

Cross-sectional data was compared between the participant groups at base-line and six months later.

Growth rates from the cross-protection assay were compared between the populations that underwent previous exposure to an herbicide and those that did not in a Dunnett's corrected paired t-test.

The evaluation design will be quasi-experimental, repeat cross-sectional, with outcomes compared between intervention and comparison areas at two time points within the project duration (2008/9 and 2010).

When the two reciprocal crosses were repeated and the proportion of unhatched eggs was compared between the crosses, however, there was a nearly perfect match between the extra no-hatch rate in the cross with SKEW sires and the observed magnitude of sex ratio bias in families from these sires, assuming all the extra no-hatch rate was caused by mortality in sons.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use precise and grammatically correct alternatives such as "cross-compare" or "compare across" to ensure clarity in your writing. This avoids confusion and maintains a professional tone.

Common error

Do not use the phrase "cross compared between". It is grammatically awkward and not recognized in standard English. Instead, opt for more conventional and clear expressions like "cross-compare" or "compare across".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross compared between" is intended to function as a comparative term. However, its non-standard grammatical structure renders it ineffective. Ludwig AI points out that this construction is incorrect, and standard alternatives like "cross-compare" or "compare across" should be favored.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cross compared between" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is better to use alternatives such as "cross-compare" or "compare across" to ensure clarity and accuracy. The lack of examples in the provided data underscores its infrequent and non-standard usage. Choosing a more appropriate phrase will enhance the professionalism and understandability of your writing.

FAQs

What is a grammatically correct way to express the idea of cross comparison?

Instead of using the awkward phrase "cross compared between", use "cross-compare" or "compare across" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

In what contexts can I use "cross-compare" effectively?

The term "cross-compare" is suitable when you want to highlight a comparison that spans different categories, data sets, or groups, such as "cross-compare survey results from different regions".

How does "compare across" differ from a simple comparison?

Compare across often suggests a more structured and methodical comparison, particularly when analyzing data or information that isn't directly comparable. It is used to identify patterns or trends from different sources.

Is "cross compared between" ever acceptable in formal writing?

No, "cross compared between" is not considered standard English and should be avoided in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "cross-compare" or "compare across" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: