Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

cross checking reference

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross checking reference" is not entirely correct in written English; it should be "cross-checking references." You can use it when discussing the process of verifying information by comparing it with other sources or references.
Example: "Before finalizing the report, I will be cross-checking references to ensure all data is accurate."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

We supplemented electronic database searches by manually cross checking reference lists from published trials and review articles.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The final set of in-extent review of the selected literature included cross checked references and direct communication with the corresponding authors when the article was not available in full length on-line.

Science

Plosone

Individually, the results are evidently hit or miss, but in general there could be some interest from marketers to regularly cross-check references on Twitter for the company they work for, the products or services they market and the brands they represent.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Further relevant articles were sourced through cross checking references in articles and from the authors' library.

And despite outcries regarding its level of accuracy, for something that's completely free and edited by volunteers, it doesn't do badly, you just need to make sure you cross check your references and sources.

News & Media

Vice

External consistency consistency of data as reported in regulatory documents, other versions of the same clinical study reports or unpublished reports, and other references, established by cross checking.

Spend 5 minutes cross checking the facts.

The results were cross checked with the references used in the Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1 1 134, 2009 and GlaxoSmithKline clinical documents related to acyclovir.

All unique papers identified above were cross checked with the references utilized in major reviews including the 2009 Cochrane report [ 1] and in GlaxoSmithKline clinical development documents related to acyclovir.

Full text articles were retrieved for 151 titles, of which 109 were excluded: non-diagnostic accuracy studies (n=47); non-acute care setting (n=33); systematic reviews (n=14), cross checked for includable references; not available in English (n=8); and unable to extract absolute numbers of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives (n=7).

We enhanced our electronic search by cross-checking the reference lists of all relevant studies.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When citing sources, always prioritize "cross-checking references" to ensure accuracy and avoid plagiarism.

Common error

Be specific when describing verification processes. Instead of "cross checking reference", use more precise terms like "verifying sources" or "cross-referencing information" to improve clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

3.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase, while not entirely grammatically sound according to Ludwig AI, intends to describe the action of verifying information by comparing it with other sources. It implies a process of ensuring accuracy and reliability.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cross checking reference" is not entirely correct; the accurate form is "cross-checking references". Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase, while understandable, is grammatically questionable. The primary intent is to describe the process of verifying information against other sources. Although infrequent, its usage spans across scientific, news, and general knowledge domains. To enhance clarity, alternatives like "verifying sources" or "cross-referencing information" are recommended. Remember, "cross-checking references" is a crucial step in ensuring accuracy and credibility in various writing contexts.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "cross checking reference"?

The phrase "cross checking reference" is not entirely correct. It is better to say "cross-checking references" or "verifying references".

What does "cross-checking references" mean?

"Cross-checking references" means verifying information by comparing it with other sources to ensure accuracy and reliability.

How can I use "verifying sources" in a sentence?

You can say, "Before publishing the article, I am "verifying sources" to ensure all data is accurate."

What are some alternatives to "cross-checking references"?

Alternatives include "verifying sources", "validating sources", or "double-checking citations" depending on the context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

3.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: