cross checking

USAGE SUMMARY

"cross checking" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it as an action verb to indicate that someone is double checking something to ensure accuracy or correctness. For example: "After inputting the numbers, she cross checked them to make sure she had entered them correctly."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

11 Penalty to Russia — cross checking on Grebeshkov for hitting Ruutuu with his stick.

The New York Times

Spend 5 minutes cross checking the facts.

WikiHow

"Cross checking wouldn't have caught this data," Mr. Morse said.

The New York Times

SNPs in italic are identified errors after cross checking.

BMC Plant Biology

PT and PZ carried out data cross checking.

BMC Genomics

This lack of cross checking may have affected the results.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

How are you cross-checking the information they give you?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

software, cross-checking carefully for any mistakes, and then correcting them.

The New Yorker

After questionnaires are completed, the second step is cross-checking the answers.

Harvard Business Review

Chicago's Dave Manson was suspended for one game for cross-checking a Washington player.

The New York Times - Sports

The accuracy of computation is assured by cross-checking the numerical results by different methods.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing formally, ensure that you have a second person "cross checking" critical data, as errors can be costly in professional environments.

Common error

While software can assist in "cross checking", don't depend on it entirely. Human oversight is crucial for catching nuanced errors that algorithms may miss.

Linguistic Context

Cross checking functions primarily as a verb phrase indicating the action of verifying information by comparing multiple sources or methods. As Ludwig shows, it is used to ensure accuracy and catch errors. This action is vital in various professional and academic settings.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

23%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

Cross checking is a verb phrase signifying the act of verifying information through multiple sources or methods to ensure accuracy. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It's commonly employed in science, news media, and wiki contexts, indicating its versatility. While "cross checking" is essential for accuracy, be mindful of common errors such as over-reliance on automated tools. For related terms, consider ""double checking"", "verifying", and "validating". This process enhances the reliability of your work, whether in academic research, professional reports, or everyday communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

double checking

This alternative emphasizes the act of checking something again, focusing on repetition for accuracy.

verifying

This term highlights confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

validating

This alternative stresses the confirmation of something's soundness or legitimacy.

confirming

This emphasizes establishing certainty about something.

authenticating

This term is used when verifying the genuineness or validity of something.

fact checking

This focuses on verifying factual information to ensure accuracy.

corroborating

This emphasizes supporting a statement or theory with evidence.

substantiating

This alternative highlights providing evidence to support the truth of something.

examining

This alternative highlights the process of inspecting something closely.

reviewing

This term implies a formal assessment or scrutiny of something.

FAQs

How can I use "cross checking" effectively in a sentence?

Use "cross checking" to describe the action of verifying information from multiple sources or methods to ensure accuracy. For example, "The team is "double checking" the data before the presentation".

What's a less formal way to say "cross checking"?

In less formal contexts, you might use phrases like "checking over" or "going through" to convey a similar meaning, depending on the specific nuance you want to express.

What is the difference between "cross checking" and "fact checking"?

"Cross checking" involves verifying information using multiple sources or methods, while "fact checking" specifically refers to verifying factual claims to ensure they are accurate and true.

Is "cross checking" always necessary?

While not always mandatory, "cross checking" is highly recommended in situations where accuracy and reliability are paramount, such as in academic research, financial reporting, or news journalism. It helps minimize errors and ensures the validity of information.