cross analysing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross analysing" is not standard in written English; the correct term is "cross-analysis" or "cross-analyzing." You can use it when referring to the process of comparing and evaluating data or information from different sources or perspectives.
Example: "The researchers engaged in cross-analysis to ensure the validity of their findings."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Line cross analyses typically begin with two inbred parental lines that are crossed to produce an F1 generation.

Plosone

When RIL are used in line cross analyses, scaling tests can be constructed for non-additive genetic effects with far more precision than traditional methods of estimation.

Plosone

The experimental cross analysed here was intended to associate RAD alleles with chromosomes, and in particular, identify sequenced markers on the chromosome encoding spinosad resistance.

Plosone

Line cross analyses are primarily carried out using frameworks based on the F2 model of Cockerham [39] or on the F-infinity model of Hayman and Mather [40].

Plosone

We analysed the case studies thematically and used rigorous multi-dimensional and multi-disciplinary interpretive validation techniques to cross analyse findings.

BMC Health Services Research

Results of line-cross analyses for hybrid traits.

Evolutionary Applications

The ubp1 mutation mapped to the bottom of the selection valley in both genetic crosses analysed.

BMC Genomics

However, the true extent of inversions or other structural rearrangements are unknown between all of the crosses analysed.

eLife

Cross correlation analyses were used to estimate time lags of GEC to EUV.

Earth, Planets and Space

Results are based on the baseline cross sectional analyses of the GHC of 9,944 participants.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

pNPY/cNPY cross correlation analyses, computed at varying time lags, were non-significant.

Psychoneuroendocrinology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the terms "cross-analysis" or "cross-analyzing" as they are more widely accepted and grammatically sound. For example, use "The study involved a thorough cross-analysis of the data" instead of "The study involved cross analysing the data".

Common error

Avoid using "cross" directly before a present participle (verb ending in -ing) such as in "cross analysing". Instead, use the noun form "cross-analysis" or the gerund/present participle "cross-analyzing" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross analysing" functions as a verb phrase aiming to describe an action of comparing and examining different elements. However, it's grammatically unconventional. Ludwig AI suggests that "cross-analysis" or "cross-analyzing" are more appropriate.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "cross analysing" aims to describe the action of comparing and examining different elements, it is not grammatically standard. Ludwig AI highlights that "cross-analysis" (noun) or "cross-analyzing" (verb) are more appropriate and widely accepted terms. Due to its grammatical ambiguity and lack of strong support from authoritative sources, it's best to opt for the more conventional alternatives to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing. Remember to use "cross-analysis" when referring to the process as a noun and "cross-analyzing" when using it as a verb.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cross-analysis

This alternative is a noun form referring to the process of cross-analyzing.

cross-analyzing

This alternative is the gerund or present participle form of the verb.

comparative analysis

This alternative is more general and focuses on the comparison aspect of analysis.

comparative assessment

This alternative replaces "analysis" with "assessment" which puts emphasis on evaluation.

integrated analysis

This focuses on combining different analyses into one comprehensive view.

intersectional analysis

This alternative highlights how different social and political identities combine to create unique experiences.

synthesized analysis

This emphasizes the synthesis of multiple analyses to form a unified conclusion.

data triangulation

This alternative is more specific to research and involves using multiple data sources to validate findings.

holistic evaluation

This is a broader term emphasizing a comprehensive and interconnected evaluation.

multi-faceted review

This suggests a review from multiple angles or perspectives.

FAQs

Is "cross analysing" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "cross analysing" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "cross-analysis" (noun) or "cross-analyzing" (verb). According to Ludwig AI, the better term is either "cross-analysis" or "cross-analyzing".

What does "cross-analysis" mean?

"Cross-analysis" refers to the process of comparing and contrasting different sets of data or information to identify patterns, relationships, or discrepancies. It is a method used to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a subject by examining it from multiple perspectives.

When should I use "cross-analyzing" instead of "cross-analysis"?

Use "cross-analysis" when referring to the process as a noun (e.g., "The cross-analysis revealed new insights"). Use "cross-analyzing" when using it as a verb or gerund (e.g., "We are cross-analyzing the data" or "Cross-analyzing the data is crucial for our research").

What are some alternative ways to say "cross analysing"?

Alternatives include "comparative analysis", "integrated analysis", or "data triangulation", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.