Exact(3)
The relative ease of system-wide cross-pollination of farmland by GM crops indicates that significant external costs could be imposed on a typical farmer because of the inability to certify produce for sale in potentially lucrative GM-free markets.
The neglected and the under-use status of these locally important crops indicates a risk of disappearance of important plant material developed over thousands of years of cultivation.
Such rapid evolution is not restricted to the laboratory; evidence from the Western corn rootworm on maize crops indicates that the pest is evolving resistance to the toxins produced by genetically engineered plants that were introduced into production only in 2003 (Gassmann et al. 2014).
Similar(57)
Data on some crops indicate highly variable yield gains in some places and declines in others.
But the crops indicate that the settlers came from even farther east.
Donald's ideotype and empirical evidence in cereal and oilseed crops indicate high yield is associated with less competitive plants.
Assessments in agricultural crops indicate that alterations in the landscape adjacent to the crops can result in reduced productivity due to loss or low abundance of pollinating agents.
For pathogens, the dominant exposure route was found to be ingestion of effluent captured on the surface of the crops indicating that risks could be significantly reduced by restricting irrigation to the non-edible parts of the crop.
Earlier studies in several other crops indicated that N deficiency reduced either Rubisco activity (Heitholt et al. 1991; Chen and cheng 2004) or the amount of the enzyme (Osaki et al. 1993; Chen and cheng 2003).
Comparing the plate plan view patterns with and without broadside compensation rolling, reduced plate end crops indicate that the broadside compensation rolling model is effective for plate plan view pattern control.
Also studies in other crops indicated that multigene families of plant Prxs tend to cluster within the genome [27], [29].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com