Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The part of the sentence 'critics for not' is not correct and usable in written English as it is.
Criticism has to be directed against something, so the phrase should be "critics for not [doing something]." For example: Many people criticized the government for not doing enough to reduce poverty in the country.
Exact(12)
She was criticized by many television critics for not saying much, however.
Film critics for not yelling loud enough?
Thereafter, the company came under pressure from Ralph Nader and other critics for not being alert to broad public interests.
When the original came out, I really loved that game, and wrote a blog post attacking other critics for not understanding the concept of innovation.
The decision represents a victory for the F.D.A. at a time when the agency is under fire from biotechnology critics for not regulating bio-engineered foods strictly enough.
Are critics like Serge Daney or Leo Steinberg any lesser a critic, have any lesser a project or point, or of any less importance to their fields, as critics, for not being active artists?
Similar(48)
So you'd forgive the TV critic's TV critic for not having kept up with what's on telly.
From time to time you get a kick from some critic for not being sufficiently political, or for being a closet unionist or a closet republican.
They met at the Oxfordshire home of Lucius Cary, the second Viscount Falkland, who on one occasion thanked a Roman Catholic critic for "not mixing gall with your inke; since I have ever thought that there should be as little bitterness in a treatise of controversie, as in a love-letter, and that the contrary way was void both of Christian charity and humane wisdom".
I silenced my internal critic for not being a good writer and published two books.
It came after Peter Kent, then the Federal Environment Minister, berated an NDP environment critic for not being at a UN meeting after he had banned non-governmental MPs from being able to attend.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com