critics

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "critics" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to individuals who evaluate or analyze works, such as art, literature, or performances, often providing opinions or reviews. Example: "The critics praised the film for its innovative storytelling and strong performances."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So on this side of things, do the critics have a point?

The Guardian - Opinion

This might not be a problem if it were a drug for TB, malaria or AIDS – but critics of the HPV donation asked why cervical cancer received such a comprehensive effort in Rwanda – reaching 95% for 11-year-old girls when disease incidence lags well behind other vaccine-preventable diseases in the developing world (read the Rwandan health minister's persuasive rebuttal).

The Guardian

Man Booker prize-winning author Hilary Mantel delivered a spirited attack on her critics after the BBC was condemned over plans to broadcast her "mischievous" short story on the imagined assassination of Margaret Thatcher.

The Guardian - Books

He has used the many attacks on him – not least from the European commission – to justify what critics correctly see as a comprehensive attempt to undermine checks and balances, and remake the entire country in the image of one political party.

The Guardian - Opinion

He was seen by critics in the province as out of touch; dangerously so because his views were respected in London.

The Guardian

Carver's critics claim he is failing to motivate his squad.

The Guardian - Sport

One of the main slogans used by Cameron and the British anti-EU critics is the fight against immigration and social benefit scams by foreigners.

The Guardian

The Trans Pacific Partnership, although billed as a trade agreement, includes provisions on intellectual property and copyright that are usually outside the boundaries of trade, critics say.

The Guardian - Business

Her critics will say: Her party is not relevant to the vast majority of voters in the UK.

The Guardian

Bachmann is probably an even more effective messenger than Santorum for these audiences, and she'd be doing it off the radar of many critics – fueling right-wing flames one town at a time.

The Guardian - Opinion

To describe this as the 'abolition of Parliamentary democracy' - as some critics have - is more than a little far-fetched.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be mindful of the tone when referring to "critics". The term can imply negativity, so consider whether a more neutral term like "reviewers" or "commentators" might be more appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "critics" without specifying who they are or what their criticisms are. Vague references can weaken your argument and lack credibility. Instead of saying "Critics argue...", specify "Film critics argue that the movie's plot is predictable."

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "critics" is as a plural noun. It typically acts as the subject or object of a sentence, referring to a group of people who express their opinions or judgments. As per Ludwig, the word is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "critics" functions as a plural noun referring to individuals who offer evaluations or judgments. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is frequently used in news and media contexts and maintains a neutral register. To improve writing, specify who the "critics" are and what they are criticizing, avoiding generalizations. Alternatives like "reviewers" or "commentators" can provide a more neutral tone when needed. The provided examples and guidance aim to enhance clarity and precision in using the term.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reviewers

Focuses specifically on those who write reviews, often in arts or media.

commentators

Highlights those who offer commentary or analysis, often in a public forum.

detractors

Emphasizes individuals who express negative opinions or try to diminish something.

opponents

Stresses those who actively disagree or challenge a position or idea.

naysayers

Implies a tendency to be negative and reject new ideas or proposals.

censurers

Highlights those who express strong disapproval or condemnation.

faultfinders

Suggests a focus on identifying flaws and imperfections.

judges

Emphasizes the act of making formal evaluations or assessments.

evaluators

Focuses on those who systematically assess the value or quality of something.

assessors

Highlights those who officially determine the nature, value or extent of something.

FAQs

What's the difference between "critics" and "reviewers"?

"Critics" generally offer more in-depth analysis and judgment, while "reviewers" primarily provide assessments of quality. You can use "reviewers" when referring to someone who evaluates and rates something.

When is it appropriate to use "critics" in writing?

Use "critics" when discussing individuals or groups who provide detailed evaluations, especially when those evaluations involve judgment or interpretation. For simpler assessments, consider alternatives like "commentators" or "evaluators".

What can I say instead of "critics" to sound more neutral?

To maintain a neutral tone, consider using alternatives like "commentators", "analysts", or "observers". These terms lack the inherent negative connotation sometimes associated with "critics".

How to avoid bias when writing about "critics"?

Present the "critics'" viewpoints fairly and accurately, even if you disagree with them. Acknowledge the basis of their criticisms and avoid using dismissive language. Focus on the substance of their arguments rather than attacking their credibility.