Sentence examples for criticized data from inspiring English sources

The European Commission has finally given the U.S. a deadline related to the much criticized data transfer mechanism known as the EU-US Privacy Shield.

This background is very relevant for Intrusion Detection in general especially considering the widespread criticism of the publicly available data sets, and yet the majority of the research uses these criticized data sets.

The UK's much criticized Data Retention and Investigation Powers Act was passed as emergency legislation back in 2014 by the then coalition government, followed the ECJ striking down European data retention powers earlier that year.

Birth records have been criticized for data quality limitations, but we limited our analyses to data elements with demonstrated reliability (Vinikoor et al. 2009).

Mr. Plodprasop, the deputy prime minister, has criticized government data, saying other findings of the pollution control department — that mercury in the water greatly exceeded safe levels — were wrong.

Last week in Paris, a bipartisan, 86-page report by three members of the French Parliament criticized the data traffic management practices of Frence mobile operators and recommended new consumer safeguards be adopted.

Speaking at the Bloomberg Markets 50 Summit in New York, Mr. Schneiderman criticized the data provider Thomson Reuters for allowing customers to pay it a premium to obtain the results early of the influential University of Michigan consumer confidence survey.

Many other researchers criticized the data's quality, citing flaws like a lack of standardized methods of collecting semen, methodological issues in semen analysis, biases in the ways men were selected, and variations in the length of time men abstained from ejaculating before their semen was collected.

Despite these advantages, scholars have criticized newspaper data for their presumed sensitivity to selection, description and researcher bias.

Our study may be criticized for data that are mainly based on perceived health status and self-reported, subjective assessments of patients, but such evaluations have proven to be valid measures of health in general populations [ 29, 30].

An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee has criticized the data of the first 150 women and concluded that a sample size re-estimation should be performed after including 320 patients (i.e. 80 per arm).