critical reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "critical reviewed" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "critically reviewed"? You can use "critically reviewed" when discussing the evaluation or analysis of a work, such as a paper or article, often in an academic or professional context. Example: "The research paper was critically reviewed by several experts in the field before publication."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

AF and JFL critical reviewed the manuscript.

BMC Gastroenterology

AJS and NC were responsible for drafting the article, all other authors critical reviewed the article.

BMC Family Practice

All authors read, critical reviewed and approved the final version to be submitted for publication.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

PMV inspired the idea, co-analyzed the data and critical reviewed the manuscript.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

CSL and EPH conceived of the CVD part of the LUCHAR study, contributed to the study design and data interpretation for the present study, and critical reviewed the manuscript.

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Many models of transient ischaemia show that protection of hippocampal and other neuronal cells by CsA is equalled by FK506, suggesting that CsA inhibition of calcineurin-mediated processes, rather than the PT, is critical (reviewed in [ 39]).

Biochemical Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

RB participated in critical reviewing and data discussion and analysis.

BMC Gastroenterology

We appreciate the critical review and suggestions from our reviewers.

BMC Cancer

There were no critical reviews.

The New York Times - Travel

It was the critical review.

The New Yorker

"I want to learn from critical reviews.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the adverb form "critically reviewed" instead of the incorrect phrase "critical reviewed" to properly describe the action of reviewing something in a critical manner.

Common error

Avoid using the adjective "critical" directly before the past participle "reviewed". The adverb "critically" correctly modifies the verb, indicating how the review was conducted.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "critical reviewed" attempts to function as a verb phrase, typically used to describe the action of evaluating or examining something with a critical perspective. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is critically reviewed.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "critical reviewed" aims to describe a thorough and evaluative review process, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct form is critically reviewed, using the adverb 'critically' to modify the verb 'reviewed'. Although examples exist, their presence does not validate the incorrect usage. The intended context is typically formal and scientific, but the grammatical error undermines its effectiveness. Remember to use the adverb form for accurate and professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

critically reviewed

Adverb form clarifies the manner of review.

thoroughly reviewed

Emphasizes the completeness and depth of the review.

assessed critically

Like 'critically reviewed', but uses 'assessed'.

carefully examined

Highlights the attention to detail in the review process.

closely scrutinized

Indicates a very detailed and critical level of review.

evaluated rigorously

Focuses on the strict and demanding nature of the evaluation.

analysed thoroughly

This specifies the method used during the reviewing: analysis.

peer-reviewed

Specifies that the review was conducted by experts in the same field.

scrutinized in detail

Highlights the level of detail involved in the review.

expertly reviewed

Highlights the expertise of the reviewer.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something was reviewed with criticism?

The correct way is to say something was "critically reviewed". Using the adverb 'critically' accurately describes the manner of review.

Is "critical reviewed" grammatically correct?

No, "critical reviewed" is grammatically incorrect. The adverb 'critically' should be used instead of the adjective 'critical' to modify the verb 'reviewed'.

What are some alternatives to "critically reviewed"?

Alternatives include "thoroughly reviewed", "carefully examined", or "closely scrutinized", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "critically reviewed" differ from "peer-reviewed"?

"Critically reviewed" simply means the review was thorough and evaluative. "Peer-reviewed" specifies that the review was conducted by experts in the same field.