Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "critic for" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It does not make sense as a stand-alone phrase. If you are writing about someone who reviews or evaluates something, you can use the phrase "critic of". For example, "John is a respected critic of modern art."
Exact(60)
At present music critic for N.Y.
Stevens is the movie critic for Slate.
Michael Glover is art critic for The Independent.
Ben Ratliff is a music critic for The Times.
William James Henderson, music critic for 44 years.
You've been a literary critic for decades.
Wilson remains the exemplary critic for me.
He is film critic for the Oregonian.
Matt Wolf is the theater critic for The International Herald Tribune.
He was this newspaper's wine critic for many years.
He is a movie critic for the weekly "Expresso".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com